2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Reliability of a Chemical Engineering Problem-solving Rubric when Using Multiple Raters

Abstract: is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. His current research involves the rheology of complex fluids as well as active learning, reverse engineering online videos, and interactive textbooks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least 3 raters individually scored each student solution to minimize rater bias. To ensure agreement among raters, an interrater reliability was completed and detailed previously . All PROCESS scores across cohorts and groups are reported by individual problem in the Supporting Information (Tables S.1–S.3).…”
Section: Methods and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 3 raters individually scored each student solution to minimize rater bias. To ensure agreement among raters, an interrater reliability was completed and detailed previously . All PROCESS scores across cohorts and groups are reported by individual problem in the Supporting Information (Tables S.1–S.3).…”
Section: Methods and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, stating that auto-graded activities are scaffolded has some justification based on the fraction correct as a function of question order. Using a single metric -fraction correct -to quantify scaffolding is a limitation of the study, and future work on problem difficulty and scaffolding could use multiple expert raters or use validated tools, e.g., NASA Task Load Index (Duckett et al 2019;Asogwa et al 2021). Question order will be examined further in the discussion of the Copy sheet button next.…”
Section: Question Type and Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of survey feedback about YouTube Fridays was positive and students felt they had a better understanding of the course topic and even felt confident solving problems. Also, students reported the ability to relate course to real world phenomena since YouTube pedagogy provided students a mechanism to apply classroom concepts to open-ended, real world situations [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%