2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2049-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the measurement invariance of the RCADS-25 questionnaire across gender and child–parent dyads in the presence of multilevel data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some violations of cross-gender measurement invariance were found, inspection of the effect of these violations showed that measurement bias had minimal impact on the constructs' means. Furthermore, consistent with previous studies (Bagheri et al, 2019;Esbjørn et al, 2012;Gormez et al, 2017;Klaufus et al, 2020), girls generally showed higher levels of RCADS anxiety and depression problems than boys.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some violations of cross-gender measurement invariance were found, inspection of the effect of these violations showed that measurement bias had minimal impact on the constructs' means. Furthermore, consistent with previous studies (Bagheri et al, 2019;Esbjørn et al, 2012;Gormez et al, 2017;Klaufus et al, 2020), girls generally showed higher levels of RCADS anxiety and depression problems than boys.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is problematic, because certain groups of children seem to be at particular risk for reporting elevated levels of anxiety and depression symptoms. For example, adolescent girls commonly report more anxiety and depression symptoms compared to boys as assessed with the RCADS in the general population (Bagheri et al, 2019;Esbjørn et al, 2012;Klaufus et al, 2020). Similar gender differences are found when assessing internalizing problems with the RCADS in the clinical population (Gormez et al, 2017), as well as when using similar DSM-based questionnaires to assess self-reported internalizing mental health problems (Abad et al, 2002).…”
Section: Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The RCADS-47 has demonstrated good internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity (20,(119)(120)(121)(122).There is also some evidence of its sensitivity to change. While the RCADS-25 has been less widely validated, it has demonstrated high internal consistency for its self-and parent-reported anxiety subscale (Cronbach's α = 0.82 -0.95), depression subscale (α = .79 -.93), and total scale (α = .88 -.90), and satisfactory testretest reliability (r = .70 -.90) for the subscales and total scale in clinical and non-clinical samples (114,(123)(124)(125). Additional research is needed to examine its sensitivity to change, and structural validity (125).…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is problematic because certain groups of children seem to be at particular risk for reporting elevated levels of anxiety and depression symptoms. For example, adolescent girls commonly report more anxiety and depression symptoms compared to boys as assessed with the RCADS, both in the general population and in clinical samples (Bagheri et al, 2019; Esbjørn et al, 2012; Gormez et al, 2017; Klaufus et al, 2020). In addition, differential levels of internalizing mental health problems have also been found for children from ethnic minority backgrounds when compared to the majority group of native children in various countries across the world, although findings are mixed (Stevens & Vollebergh, 2008).…”
Section: Why Assess Measurement Invariance (Mi)?mentioning
confidence: 99%