2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-022-02883-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of these species were shared between the two sampling sites, namely, Aptenia cordifolia and Tephrosia grandiflora , while five other species were recorded only within the university campus. This indicates an increase in the movement of native species outside their historic native range and the lack of reporting of this phenomenon globally [ 48 ]. We encourage the landscaping services at different institutions to use native plant species from the same biogeographical region for ornamental or landscaping purposes, as native species pose risks of forming native-alien populations in different countries and have been reported to threaten biodiversity [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these species were shared between the two sampling sites, namely, Aptenia cordifolia and Tephrosia grandiflora , while five other species were recorded only within the university campus. This indicates an increase in the movement of native species outside their historic native range and the lack of reporting of this phenomenon globally [ 48 ]. We encourage the landscaping services at different institutions to use native plant species from the same biogeographical region for ornamental or landscaping purposes, as native species pose risks of forming native-alien populations in different countries and have been reported to threaten biodiversity [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard approaches and tools for measuring and recording survey effort are currently not developed, and harmonized guidelines will be needed. Examples of relevant data on the survey effort include measures, such as hectares surveyed for IAS per assessment period (Cheney et al., 2018), numbers of inspections of high‐risk establishment sites (Lovell et al., 2021), volume of cargo inspected (Miralles et al., 2021), time spent searching for a specific species (Mehta et al., 2007), number of high conservation value areas surveyed for IAS (Keet et al., 2022), and proportion of cells with expected presences that have relevant observations, the metric underpinning the Species Information Index (Oliver et al., 2021). New monitoring technologies are increasingly available, such as remotely sensed products (e.g., unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), satellite, and camera traps) or eDNA approaches, which through fixed elements of deployment protocols (e.g., area surveyed and number of traps or samples) provide quantifiable, efficient, and effective ways to survey a subset of IAS for rapid and systematic observations (van Rees et al., 2022).…”
Section: Data Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard approaches and tools for measuring and recording survey effort are currently not developed, and harmonized guidelines will be needed. Examples of relevant data on the survey effort include measures, such as hectares surveyed for IAS per assessment period (Cheney et al, 2018), numbers of inspections of high-risk establishment sites (Lovell et al, 2021), volume of cargo inspected (Miralles et al, 2021), time spent searching for a specific species (Mehta et al, 2007), number of high conservation value areas surveyed for IAS (Keet et al, 2022), and proportion of cells with expected presences that have relevant observations, the metric underpinning the Species Information Index (Oliver et al, 2021). New monitoring technologies are increasingly available, such as remotely sensed products (e.g., unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), satellite, and camera traps) or eDNA approaches, which through fixed elements of deployment protocols (e.g., area surveyed and number of traps or samples) provide quantifiable, efficient, and effective ways to survey a subset of IAS for rapid and systematic observations (van Rees et al, 2022).…”
Section: Data Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%