2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the inter-annual variability of separation distances around odour sources to protect the residents from odour annoyance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, 63% of respondents reported that the odor type was offensive. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies [15,16,36,37]. The impact factors of the odor emission by distance to the landfill site is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Odor Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, 63% of respondents reported that the odor type was offensive. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies [15,16,36,37]. The impact factors of the odor emission by distance to the landfill site is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Odor Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The symptoms that people encountered were predominantly nausea (15.7%) and shortness of breath (15.5%). Surveyed communities of this study perceived greater concerns and health issues in comparison with a previous one [37]. The odor concerns of respondents by distance to the landfill site is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Annoyance Of Daily Life and Human Health Effectsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The L, by definition, can approach positive or negative infinity for neutral states, so that the inverse of L (regularly called the Obukhov stability parameter) is evaluated here. Stable atmospheres have positive values of 1/L; unstable atmospheres have negative values of 1/L; neutral atmospheres have |1/L| values of nearly zero [41]. Because the dispersion calculations were conducted by applying the ADJ_U* option, the minimum positive value of L was observed to be 12.3 m. As a consequence, 1/L values were limited to 0.08 m −1 .…”
Section: Separation Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nearly zero [41]. Because the dispersion calculations were conducted by applying the ADJ_U* option, the minimum positive value of L was observed to be 12.3 m. As a consequence, 1/L values were limited to 0.08 m -1 .…”
Section: Separation Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most onerous impacts is odorous impact 3-7 . Odour nuisance can be counteracted in various ways, such as: change of type of resources or technologies, modifi cation of process parameters, increase of ejection point of polluted air to the atmosphere, hermetisation, deodorisation and also -in the case of new objectsproper localization [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] . The choice of the optimal solution is possible by modelling odorants dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%