2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the influence of operating conditions and thermophysical properties on the accuracy of in-situ measured U -values using quantitative internal infrared thermography

Abstract: Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC http://upcommons.upc.edu/e-prints Aquesta és una còpia de l'author's final draft d'un article publicat a Energy and Buildings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In southern European countries, the literature review suggested some recommendations to conduct measurements in existing buildings by NDT methods: (i) tests should be conducted on early morning or after the sunset in order to achieve steady-state conditions [20][21][22]; (ii) a correct estimation of the heat transfer coefficients and parameters related to the calibration of the IR camera should be required [1]; (iii) IRT survey should be performed when stable weather conditions can be guaranteed in-prior [1]; (iv) the metering section of the HFM should be defined by a qualitative inspection prior to the experimental campaign [44]; (v) the temperature gradient across the building envelope should range from 7 to 10 • [32]; (vi) the type of heating unit can influence the results, since non-homogeneous heat fluxes and fluctuations of wall temperatures could be attributed to air peak currents [20]. However, some of the mentioned requirements can be a challenging task in Northern European countries where the climatic conditions are often more extreme and more variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In southern European countries, the literature review suggested some recommendations to conduct measurements in existing buildings by NDT methods: (i) tests should be conducted on early morning or after the sunset in order to achieve steady-state conditions [20][21][22]; (ii) a correct estimation of the heat transfer coefficients and parameters related to the calibration of the IR camera should be required [1]; (iii) IRT survey should be performed when stable weather conditions can be guaranteed in-prior [1]; (iv) the metering section of the HFM should be defined by a qualitative inspection prior to the experimental campaign [44]; (v) the temperature gradient across the building envelope should range from 7 to 10 • [32]; (vi) the type of heating unit can influence the results, since non-homogeneous heat fluxes and fluctuations of wall temperatures could be attributed to air peak currents [20]. However, some of the mentioned requirements can be a challenging task in Northern European countries where the climatic conditions are often more extreme and more variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the thermal gradient through the wall was within the range of 7-10 • C in the case of test without heating. The deviation between the theoretical and measured U-value was 1.24 up to 3.97% for a test duration of 2-3 h. Further research of the same authors allowed evaluating the impact of operating conditions and thermo-physical properties on the quality of the results [32] as well as verifying if non-transient regime have been achieved during in situ tests [33]. The results pointed out that the most favorable range of temperature gradient between inside and outside environment was from 7 to 16 • C, considering unheated buildings and heavy and poorly insulated walls.…”
Section: Quantitative Infrared Thermography Under Steady-state Conditmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Then, the state and observation equations can be expressed as in Equations (11) and (12), respectively:…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on non-destructive methods. One non-destructive method utilizes infrared cameras [8][9][10][11]. Tejedor et al [10] built a measuring system composed of an IR camera, a reflector, and a blackbody and achieved short-time measurements of 2-3 h. Their results show a deviation of 3-4% from literature values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using infrared cameras: This approach uses the infrared thermovision technique (ITT) [19][20][21][22] to analyze the surface temperature of the envelope. The U-value of the building envelope can be calculated using the temperature information and the total heat transfer coefficient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%