2018
DOI: 10.3390/en11071885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Feasibility of Improving the Accuracy of In Situ Measurements in the Air-Surface Temperature Ratio Method

Abstract: This paper reports on a feasibility study conducted to improve the in situ measurement accuracy of the air-surface temperature ratio (ASTR) method. The measured relative error rate was analyzed using the ISO 6946 [7.69 W/(m2·K)] and Korea Energy Saving Design Standard [9.09 W/(m2·K)] indoor total surface heat transfer coefficients. The relative error rate was analyzed according to fluctuations in outdoor temperature data. The relative error rate obtained using the ISO 6946 standard was analyzed about 6.3% and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Method 5, which creates an imaginary center point, values are omitted for the existing variables used for principal component extraction In both methods, the difference is clearly revealed in the variables PC1 and Y01, and representative buildings with particularly opposite values in the building envelope U-value, which is the first main component containing the most information on the existing variables, were derived. Figure 6 shows the parameters of representative buildings derived by methods 5 In the case of Method 5, which creates an imaginary center point, values are omitted for the existing variables used for principal component extraction In both methods, the difference is clearly revealed in the variables PC1 and Y01, and representative buildings with particularly opposite values in the building envelope U-value, which is the first main component containing the most information on the existing variables, were derived.…”
Section: Clustering Results After Dimension Reduction (Principal Compomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of Method 5, which creates an imaginary center point, values are omitted for the existing variables used for principal component extraction In both methods, the difference is clearly revealed in the variables PC1 and Y01, and representative buildings with particularly opposite values in the building envelope U-value, which is the first main component containing the most information on the existing variables, were derived. Figure 6 shows the parameters of representative buildings derived by methods 5 In the case of Method 5, which creates an imaginary center point, values are omitted for the existing variables used for principal component extraction In both methods, the difference is clearly revealed in the variables PC1 and Y01, and representative buildings with particularly opposite values in the building envelope U-value, which is the first main component containing the most information on the existing variables, were derived.…”
Section: Clustering Results After Dimension Reduction (Principal Compomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the government has revised and implemented the subdivision of regional classification and strengthening of the heat permeation rate (W/(m 2 •K)) of buildings in each region since September 2018 to expand the distribution of energy-saving buildings, but it is limited to new buildings [3]. To achieve the GHG emission forecast for the building sector, which was aimed at by 2030, it is time to try to improve energy efficiency not only for new construction but also for existing buildings [4,5]. For energy efficiency, high efficiency of equipment in existing buildings is also important, but first, it is necessary to improve the energy efficiency of the building itself so as to minimize the energy demand (kWh/(m 2 •a)) of the building [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, experimental methods are today the best opportunity to characterize the thermal transmittance of existing buildings. A total of three methods with different characteristics can be distinguished: the method from ISO 9869- 1 [19] (also known as heat flow meter method), infrared thermography methods [20][21][22][23][24] and the thermometric method [25][26][27]. The heat flow meter method is the only method developed by a standard, so professionals use it the most and many research studies have studied it [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same study [36], the authors reflected that the error in evaluating the thermal transmittance with surface temperature measurements is reduced to 6%. The method has been validated through the tests carried out by Andújar-Márquez et al [37], Bienvenido-Huertas et al [25] and Kim et al [26,27]. One of the main limitations of the thermometric method is the value associated with the total heat transfer coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, information between different sites characterized by different construction realities cannot be generalized. In light of this consideration, specific investigations on the energy diagnosis of the existing historical buildings are necessary to know the basic "initial" data for the development of any project on the efficiency of the building envelope [4]. The intervention on historical walls, in fact, highlights the difficulty of identifying design solutions that are effective and compatible due to the lack of specific data on their thermal characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%