1982
DOI: 10.1016/0164-0704(82)90004-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impact of varying economic conditions on federal reserve behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My methodology differs substantially from that employed in the standard reaction-functioa literature that was surveyed by Barth, Sickles, and West (1982) and Froyen (1974 This article is significantly different from published ernpirical work dealing with optimal Federal Reserve behavior or central bank-objective functions. Taylor (1979) used a small structural model to study optimal monetary policy in the United States.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…My methodology differs substantially from that employed in the standard reaction-functioa literature that was surveyed by Barth, Sickles, and West (1982) and Froyen (1974 This article is significantly different from published ernpirical work dealing with optimal Federal Reserve behavior or central bank-objective functions. Taylor (1979) used a small structural model to study optimal monetary policy in the United States.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These signs are consistent with previous monetary policy reaction functions. For a survey, see Barth, Sickles, and Weist (1982). 3.…”
Section: The Variables Included In This Reaction Function Are Similarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is customary to include the balance of trade as an objective. See Barth, Sickles, and Weist (1982). 5.…”
Section: The Variables Included In This Reaction Function Are Similarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if one can find such an effect using a single equation, presumably the effect would be even larger if the monetary base were so endogenized. For an analysis of monetary reaction functions, see Abrams, Froyen and Waud (1982), Barth, Sickles, and Wiest (1982), Beck (1983), Bradley (1984), and Levy (1981). Lombra (1984) provides an interesting and more general discussion of the stated-versus-actual behavior of the monetary authority.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%