2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impact of communication costs on international trade

Abstract: Communication costs are frequently cited as an important determinant of trade costs. We test this relationship by incorporating alternative measures of communication costs in a model of bilateral trade. We find that international variations in communication costs indeed have a significant influence on trade patterns. Furthermore, estimates using disaggregated data reveal that communication costs are more important for trade in differentiated products than for trade in homogenous products. D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
158
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
158
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the language channel appears to depend on direct (spoken) communication rather than indirect communication by mail. This is in line with Fink et al (2005), who demonstrate the importance of international calling prices for the volume of bilateral trade. Finally, the significant negative relationship between the volume of trade and the distance-transport cost interaction holds potential for future applications of this method-ology.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, the language channel appears to depend on direct (spoken) communication rather than indirect communication by mail. This is in line with Fink et al (2005), who demonstrate the importance of international calling prices for the volume of bilateral trade. Finally, the significant negative relationship between the volume of trade and the distance-transport cost interaction holds potential for future applications of this method-ology.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Hence, these offices are in fact an additional presence of trade promotion institutions in the importer country and therefore their impact on trade is most properly compared to that of additional diplomatic missions as opposed to the existence of such missions at all (i.e., a count variable instead of a binary variable). 5 Consistently, the existent empirical evidence indicates that the trade reducing effect of communication costs is larger for differentiated goods (see Fink et al, 2005). Similarly, Portes et al (2001) find that information flows are more important for less value of the information institutions disseminate and henceforth their effects may be also expected to differ across goods according to their degree of differentiation.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Countries with access to Internet facilities seem to have a higher propensity to export. Freund & Weinhold (2000) illustrate that a 10% increase in web hosts increase trade by 1%, while Fink et al (2005) show the importance of communications and calculate that a 10% fall in telecom costs increase trade by 8%. A multi-dimensional approach is adopted by to analyse various aspects of trade facilitation.…”
Section: Trade Facilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%