2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38889-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Environmental Impact of Car Restrictions Policies: Madrid Central Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding noise pollution, there is a body of work on analyzing urban noise and its impact on the population's health [50][51][52][53][54][55]. There are only a few studies done in this regard [12,56]. However, most of the studies presented above studied also some variables related to noise pollution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding noise pollution, there is a body of work on analyzing urban noise and its impact on the population's health [50][51][52][53][54][55]. There are only a few studies done in this regard [12,56]. However, most of the studies presented above studied also some variables related to noise pollution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different models were used to simulate and evaluate a short-term action plan to mitigate pollution emissions [58,59]. More recently, after the application of MC, Lebrusán and Toutouh [12] evaluated the effectiveness of this measure in reducing pollution inside the LEZ. Another study applied computational intelligence (deep neural networks and regression analysis) to evaluate the evolution of NO 2 concentration in the air, but again only locally (inside the MC area) [60].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This article is an extension of a preliminary study in which this pedestrianization measure was locally evaluated in terms of its impact on the LEZ on subset of pollutants [12]. The data used in that study comprises a time frame of 30 months (between December 2016 and May 2019), even if MC was active just during six months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%