2017
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2017.1316777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the efficiency of shape-based functions and descriptors in multi-scale matching of linear objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For their ease of implementation, these methods quickly received much attention and research, and many variants of the TF including Signature Function [32] and Tangent Function [33] were presented. In recent research [34], the TF was mentioned to achieve the best matching result among many methods.…”
Section: Complex Geometry Parameter-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their ease of implementation, these methods quickly received much attention and research, and many variants of the TF including Signature Function [32] and Tangent Function [33] were presented. In recent research [34], the TF was mentioned to achieve the best matching result among many methods.…”
Section: Complex Geometry Parameter-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [41] compared the angles and directions of linear features and obtained high accuracy results by further comparing the topological relationships between the matched features. To carry out shape comparison in images, Ali Abbaspour et al [42] studied three functions (turning, signature, and tangent functions) and three shape descriptors (shape context, LORD, and shape signature). In addition, Ali Abbaspour et al [42] demonstrated that the turning function can be used to efficiently distinguish objects in terms of their shapes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To carry out shape comparison in images, Ali Abbaspour et al [42] studied three functions (turning, signature, and tangent functions) and three shape descriptors (shape context, LORD, and shape signature). In addition, Ali Abbaspour et al [42] demonstrated that the turning function can be used to efficiently distinguish objects in terms of their shapes. In particular, the existing studies on shape-based query-by-sketch for image retrieval [26][27][28][29][30][31]33,34] focused on a small number of objects for comparison, whereas a sketch map may contain typically 12-17 objects [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear objects might vary in terms of shape so that the difference in the shape of two objects is used as another well-known criterion for the evaluation of the difference between two polylines (open or close). One of the functions related to the object shape is the cumulative angle function [55,56]. To calculate the shape difference between two linear objects, Equation (7) could be adopted in which θ PL 1 and θ PL 2 are the cumulative angle functions of the linear objects PL 1 and PL 2 , respectively [54]:…”
Section: Shapementioning
confidence: 99%