2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi7070283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape Similarity Assessment Method for Coastline Generalization

Abstract: Although shape similarity is one fundamental element in coastline generalization quality, its related research is still inadequate. Consistent with the hierarchical pattern of shape recognition, the Dual-side Bend Forest Shape Representation Model is presented by reorganizing the coastline into bilateral bend forests, which are made of continuous root-bends based on Constrained Delaunay Triangulation and Convex Hull. Subsequently, the shape contribution ratio of each level in the model is expressed by its area… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the differences between the types of linear and polygonal features, the method for evaluating their degree of similarity differs. As a result, various indices are utilized to measure the degree of similarity between them (Li et al, 2019, Chen et al, 2020. In this study, the intersection and minimum central distance indexes were employed to assess the degree of similarity of citizens' proposed areas (Figure 3).…”
Section: Spatial Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the differences between the types of linear and polygonal features, the method for evaluating their degree of similarity differs. As a result, various indices are utilized to measure the degree of similarity between them (Li et al, 2019, Chen et al, 2020. In this study, the intersection and minimum central distance indexes were employed to assess the degree of similarity of citizens' proposed areas (Figure 3).…”
Section: Spatial Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the algorithm should include the extraction of global and local features [27]. The former involves the use statistical methods to extract global features, such as area, perimeter, circumscribed rectangle, and Hausdorff distance, from geometric figures; the latter describes the local structure of the graph based on curvature [28], key points [29], concave-convex morphology [30], Hough variation [31], etc.…”
Section: Shape Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the previous research, it can be known that compared with Euclidian distance (Peuquet 1992), Bottleneck distance (Efrat et al 2001), and Fréchet distance (Nayyeri et al 2015), Hausdorff distance is one of the most used distances for spatial objects in GIS, but it is sensitive to the shape of the objects, especially to the outliers. Besides, it does not satisfy the change law of similarity (Li et al, 2018). Therefore, Mean-Hausdorff distance (MHD) is selected as the distance similarity metric to obtain more stable and accurate result (Deng et al 2007).…”
Section: Selection Of Evaluation Index and Determination Its Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essence of shape similarity is to judge the coincidence degree between polylines. Therefore, Li (2018) 1)) could eliminate the interference of detail difference, which is more suitable for the comparison between multi-scale polylines of the same target.…”
Section: Selection Of Evaluation Index and Determination Its Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%