Assessing the Effects of Families for Safe Dates, a Family-Based Teen Dating Abuse Prevention Program

Foshee, Vangie A.; Reyes, H. Luz McNaughton; Ennett, Susan T.; Cance, Jessica D.; Bauman, Karl E.; Bowling, J. Michael

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.029

Cited by 145 publications

(175 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

169

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thirteen papers reported on controlled trials [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] which involved nine different programmes. Nine distinct trials were reported among the 13 papers; eight of these used some kind of clustering design.…”

Section: Quantitative Studies: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people (PEACH): a mixed knowledge scoping review

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundA range of interventions that aim to prevent domestic abuse has been developed for children and young people in the general population. While these have been widely implemented, few have been rigorously evaluated. This study aimed to discover what was known about these interventions for children and what worked for whom in which settings.Review methodsThis mixed knowledge review was informed by realist principles and comprised four overlapping phases: an online mapping survey to identify current provision; a systematic review of the existing literature; a review of the UK ‘grey’ literature; and consultation with young people and experts. Information from these four sources of evidence informed analysis of costs and benefits.ResultsThe evidence for interventions achieving changes in knowledge and attitudes was stronger than that for behavioural change. Shifting social norms in the peer group emerged as a key mechanism of change. Media campaigns act to influence the wider social climate within which more targeted interventions are received, and they are also a source for programme materials. While most interventions are delivered in secondary schools, they are increasingly targeted at younger children. The review emphasised the importance of a school’s ‘readiness’ to introduce preventative interventions which need to be supported across all aspects of school life. Involving young people in the design and delivery of programmes increases authenticity and this emerged as a key ingredient in achieving impact. Longer interventions delivered by appropriately trained staff appeared likely to be more effective. Teachers emerged as well placed to embed interventions in schools but they require training and support from those with specialist knowledge in domestic abuse. There was evidence that small groups of students who were at higher risk might have accounted for some results regarding effectiveness and that programme effectiveness may vary for certain subgroups. Increasingly, boys are being identified as a target for change. The study identified a need for interventions for disabled children and children and young people from black, Asian, minority ethnic and refugee groups and a particular lack of materials designed for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender young people.LimitationsVery little evidence was identified on costs and cost-effectiveness. Few studies showed an effect at the level of significance set for the review. Where it did exist, the effect size was small, except in respect of improved knowledge. The inability to calculate a response rate for the mapping survey, which used a snowballing approach, limits the ability to generalise from it.ConclusionsWhile it is appropriate to continue to deliver interventions to whole populations of children and young people, effectiveness appeared to be influenced by high-risk children and young people, who should be directed to additional support. Programmes also need to make provision to manage any resulting disclosures. Interventions appear to be context specific, and so those already being widely delivered in the UK and which are likely to be acceptable should be robustly tested.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research programme.

show abstract

Section: Quantitative Studies: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people (PEACH): a mixed knowledge scoping review

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results indicated that 86.9% of the adolescents had already been victims of some type of violence, and 86.8% confirmed having committed some form of aggression during a rela- (29) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Of all the studies analyzed, 17 assessed intervention programs carried out with adolescents with the purpose of preventing intimate partner violence (4,(8)(9)(10)(11)14,17,19,21,24,27,29,31,(33)(34)(35)(36) .…”

Section: ) Relacionamentos íNtimos Juvenismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The program effectively promoted change within the family context, which favored continued discussions about violence. Thus, it proved to be a powerful intervention for reducing negative communication among fathers, mothers, and adolescents (29) .…”

Section: ) Relacionamentos íNtimos Juvenismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the studies (14,22,26,29,33) suggested formulating strategies that involve families, peers, and the context in which adolescents are inserted. This context is deeply related to the formation and acceptance of attitudes and behaviors in intimate relationships and conflict management that involves relationships and attitudes (26) .…”

Section: ) Relacionamentos íNtimos Juvenismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Preventing violence by intimate partners in adolescence: an integrative review

Oliveira

Gessner

Brancaglioni

et al. 2016

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:To analyze the scientific literature on preventing intimate partner violence among adolescents in the field of health based on gender and generational categories. Method: This was an integrative review. We searched for articles using LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, and SciELO databases. Results: Thirty articles were selected. The results indicate that most studies assessed interventions conducted by programs for intimate partner violence prevention. These studies adopted quantitative methods, and most were in the area of nursing, psychology, and medicine. Furthermore, most research contexts involved schools, followed by households, a hospital, a health center, and an indigenous tribe. Conclusion: The analyses were not conducted from a gender -and generation-based perspective. Instead, the scientific literature was based on positivist research models, intimately connected to the classic public healthcare model and centered on a singular dimension.

show abstract

Efficacy of Interventions to Prevent Physical and Sexual Dating Violence Among Adolescents

Piolanti

Foran

2022

JAMA Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IMPORTANCE Sexual and physical dating violence is prevalent among adolescents and is associated with adverse health effects.OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to assess the efficacy of prevention programs for sexual and physical dating violence in adolescents.DATA SOURCES Search terms were combined for dating violence, adolescents, and randomized clinical trials in PsycINFO/Eric/PsycArticles, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from inception through April 2021.STUDY SELECTION Included studies had a randomized design of any type examining the efficacy of an intervention to reduce dating violence among adolescents and provided at least 1 measure of sexual or physical dating violence. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISData extraction coded characteristics of trials, participants, and interventions and assessed risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. Outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to explore the target population and intervention factors associated with positive outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe odds ratio (OR) was calculated for 3 different outcomes:(1) sexual dating violence, (2) physical dating violence, and (3) composite measures of sexual and physical dating violence. For each outcome, separate analyses were conducted for survivorship and perpetration scores. We also combined the scores of physical/sexual violence and perpetration/survivorship of teen dating violence into a single composite overall outcome including all studies.RESULTS Eighteen trials (22 781 adolescents) were included. Overall, interventions were associated with reduced physical and sexual dating violence (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.89; P < .001). Separate analyses further indicated that this association was significant for physical violence perpetration (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92; P = .01) and survivorship (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.95; P = .01). For sexual violence, the association was not statistically significant. Exploratory subgroup analyses revealed that trials targeting at-risk youth, older adolescents (age >15 years), and trials involving parents in the intervention reported significantly larger effect sizes. Meta-regression analyses did not show any significant associations between intervention effect sizes and length or intensity of the programs. Publication bias was observed, but the adjusted ORs remained significant. Three studies reported iatrogenic associations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEFindings from this study suggest that prevention programs may be effective in reducing physical teen dating violence, but there is unclear evidence of the effect on sexual violence outcomes. Further research assessing the active ingredients of interventions, especially in the area of sexual dating violence, is warranted.

show abstract

Assessing the Effects of Families for Safe Dates, a Family-Based Teen Dating Abuse Prevention Program

Cited by 145 publications

References 30 publications

Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people (PEACH): a mixed knowledge scoping review

Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people (PEACH): a mixed knowledge scoping review

Preventing violence by intimate partners in adolescence: an integrative review

Efficacy of Interventions to Prevent Physical and Sexual Dating Violence Among Adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About