Assessing the effects of cellulose-inorganic nanofillers on thermo/pH-dual responsive hydrogels

Preparation and Evaluation of a Sulfadimethoxine‐Conjugated Hydrogel Based on N‐isopropylacrylamide as a Sustained Release Drug Delivery System

“…Also, the protons at 6.33 and 6.48 ppm are ascribed to (Hd) and (He), respectively. In addition, the appearance of the peaks at 187.96, 181.15, and 96.85 ppm in 13 CNMR spectra are confirmed the presence of carbonyl carbons of carboxylic acid and amide groups and C=C groups in NMSDMO monomer, respectively (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The results suggested that the sulfadimithoxine was effectively maleylated.…”

Highly viscoelastic, stretchable, conductive, and self-healing strain sensors based on cellulose nanofiber-reinforced polyacrylic acid hydrogel

“…For TOCNFs, the peaks at 2900, 1409, and 1027cm − 1 originated from the C − H stretching, CH 2 in-plane bending, and CH bending vibration, respectively (Yu et al 2014). The peak at around 1600cm − 1 can be attributed to the carboxylic groups or the bending vibration of O-H because of the TEMPO-mediated oxidation (Yue et al 2020). The band at 1625cm − 1 was vested in the C = O stretching vibration in the carboxylic acid groups, indicating the appearance of the − OH and − COOH in the CNTs (Han et al 2019).…”

Smart DEA–QCGM–CNT hydrogels with temperature- and NIR-responsive behavior achieved by the synergy between CNT and QCGM for wound dressing

“…The hydrogels are in an elastic state at this stage and return easily to the original shape once the compressive stress removed. Conversely, when the strain of the hydrogel increased to 40%-80%, the compressive stress increased rapidly, indicating that energy dissipation occurred inside the hydrogels to resist the compressive stress 48 . As shown in Figure 6a, the maximum compressive strengths of DQ 0 C 0 , DQ 0.5 C 0 , DQ 0.5 C 1 , and DQ 0.5 C 2 are 0.025, 0.040, 0.116, and 0.046 MPa, respectively.…”