2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
294
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
294
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of leaving treatment by patients in the scope of probation is also very high [12,13]. There exist studies which assert that structured, wellapplied treatment programmes with continuity have positive effects on the substance use of substance users on probation [14][15][16].…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of leaving treatment by patients in the scope of probation is also very high [12,13]. There exist studies which assert that structured, wellapplied treatment programmes with continuity have positive effects on the substance use of substance users on probation [14][15][16].…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borrowing from the established evidence on problem-solving courts (Mitchell, Wilson, Eggers, & MacKenzie, 2012;Sarteschi, Vaughn, & Kim, 2011), one possible explanation for the null findings observed here may be the lack of a specific target population or underlying criminogenic factor. In drug treatment and mental health courts, eligibility is based on substance abuse and mental illness respectively.…”
Section: [Insert Figure 1 About Here] Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Multiple systematic reviews indicate that drug treatment and drug courts can significantly and positively impact recidivism Mitchell, Wilson, Eggers, & MacKenzie, 2012;Mitchell, Wilson, & MacKenzie, 2007).…”
Section: Behavior-based Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%