Assessing the Eco‐efficiency of End‐of‐Pipe Technologies with the Environmental Cost Efficiency Indicator

Abstract

Summary The concept of eco‐efficiency is increasingly being applied to judge the combined environmental and economic performance of product systems, processes, and/or companies. Ecoefficiency is often defined as the ratio of economic value added to environmental impact added. This definition is not appropriate for end‐of‐pipe treatment technologies because these technologies aim at improving the environmental performance of technical processes at the cost of financial expense. Therefore, an indicator for the assessment of end‐of‐pipe technologies has been proposed. This indicator, called environmental cost efficiency (ECE), is defined as the ratio of net environmental benefits to the difference in costs. ECE is applied to four end‐of‐pipe technologies for the treatment of municipal solid waste: sanitary landfill, mechanical‐biological treatment, modern grate incineration, and a staged thermal process (pyrolysis and gasification). A life‐cycle assessment was performed on these processes to quantify the net environmental benefit. Moreover, the approximate net costs (costs minus benefits) were quantified. The results show that, relative to grate incineration, sanitary landfills and mechanical‐biological treatment are less costly but environmentally more harmful. We calculated the ECE for all combinations of technologies. The results indicate that the staged thermal process may be the most environmentally cost‐efficient alternative to all other treatment technologies in the long run, followed by mechanical‐biological treatment and grate incineration.

International progress and evaluation on interactive coupling effects between urbanization and the eco-environment

“…As an area of research where a range of disciplines intersect, scholars from a range of scien-tific backgrounds have proposed and developed a series of theories on interactive coupling between urbanization and the eco-environment, including the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, urban metabolism theory, telecoupling theory, footprint family theory, planetary boundaries theory, social-economic-natural complex systems theory , urban vulnerability theory (Adger, 2006), eco-efficiency theory (Hellweg et al, 2005) and environmental justice theory (Wolch et al, 2014).…”

Flexible and robust strategies for waste management in Sweden

“…For example, there may be a potential for advantages of scale and increased automatisation within, e.g., plastic recycling (Ny teknik, 2003). Also for incineration there may be possibilities for further technological developments that may result in eco-efficient solutions (Hellweg et al, 2005). However, no major technological jumps are foreseen (Olofsson, 2004).…”

Modeling the final phase of landfill gas generation from long-term observations

“…In the discussion about climate change, ''waste to energy'' and resource recovery were recognized as potential strategies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions (Hellweg et al 2005). Regarding the landfill gas, there is a twofold goal, economic utilization of its energy content and reduction of negative impacts on climate (Ackerman 2000).…”