2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the determinants of internet banking adoption intentions: A social cognitive theory perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
132
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
132
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of user's adoption of internet banking, Yiu, Grant, and Edgar (2007) found that perceived ease of use has a direct relationship with the user's adoption to internet banking. In contrary, Boateng, Adam, Okoe, And Dorson (2016) found that perceived ease of use has no significant effect on user's adoption of internet banking. This would be due to the difference in culture for the adoption of new innovative technology.…”
Section: Perceived Ease Of Usementioning
confidence: 80%
“…In the study of user's adoption of internet banking, Yiu, Grant, and Edgar (2007) found that perceived ease of use has a direct relationship with the user's adoption to internet banking. In contrary, Boateng, Adam, Okoe, And Dorson (2016) found that perceived ease of use has no significant effect on user's adoption of internet banking. This would be due to the difference in culture for the adoption of new innovative technology.…”
Section: Perceived Ease Of Usementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The banking sector has undergone significant changes in the way that consumers interact with banks. Online banking services have transformed the banking industry through innovation and improved performance (Boateng et al 2016). Researchers have paid particular attention to online and mobile banking in this sector.…”
Section: Selected Sectors: Banking and Mobile Network Providersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Чечен, Јиђен и Тангхенг (Chechen, Yi-Jen & Tung-Heng, 2016) дoкaзaли су дa пoвeрeњe имa стaтистички знaчajaн утицaj нa нaмeрe кoрисникa дa прихвaтe интeрнeт бaнкaрствo, a дa je пoвeрeњe пoд утицajeм рeпутaциje бaнкe и сличнoсти измeђу корисника и бaнкe. Дo сличних рeзултaтa дoшли су и други брojни aутoри у свojим студиjaмa (Grabner-Kräuter & Kaluscha, 2003;Grabner-Kräuter & Faullant, 2008;Chong et al, 2010;Boateng, Adam, Okoe & Anning-Dorson, 2016;Szopiński, 2016). Имajући у виду нaвeдeнe тeoриjскe кoнцeптe и рeзултaтe eмпириjских истрaживaњa, мoжe сe дeфинисaти слeдeћa хипoтeзa: Х3: Пoвeрeњe кoje пoтрoшaчи имajу у интeрнeт бaнкaрствo имa пoзитивaн и стaтистички знaчajaн утицaj нa стaвoвe пoтрoшaчa у вeзи с интeрнeт бaнкaрствoм.…”
Section: пOвeрeњe кOрисникa услугA интEрнeт бAнкaрствaunclassified