2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the conservation status of species with limited available data and disjunct distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrated the greatest extent of typical cerrado tree species in the LIG, the greatest contraction in the LGM, and a subsequent re‐expansion in the Holocene. The values obtained by TSS and AUC modelling suggest that the environmental variables used in our models provided important information on the distribution of the tree species selected as indicators of typical cerrado vegetation, and were higher than those obtained by other studies modelling the climatic distribution of neotropical vegetation (Carnaval and Moritz , Werneck et al , , Pena et al ), but which did not model individual indicator species. The indicator species method has been widely and effectively used to determine ecological indicators of community types, habitat conditions, and environmental changes (Dufrêne and Legendre , Carignan and Villard , Niemi and McDonald , De Cáceres and Legendre , De Cáceres et al , ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Our results demonstrated the greatest extent of typical cerrado tree species in the LIG, the greatest contraction in the LGM, and a subsequent re‐expansion in the Holocene. The values obtained by TSS and AUC modelling suggest that the environmental variables used in our models provided important information on the distribution of the tree species selected as indicators of typical cerrado vegetation, and were higher than those obtained by other studies modelling the climatic distribution of neotropical vegetation (Carnaval and Moritz , Werneck et al , , Pena et al ), but which did not model individual indicator species. The indicator species method has been widely and effectively used to determine ecological indicators of community types, habitat conditions, and environmental changes (Dufrêne and Legendre , Carignan and Villard , Niemi and McDonald , De Cáceres and Legendre , De Cáceres et al , ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The estimates of the geographic range extent obtained by ENM techniques have proved to be more representative than those obtained by traditional methods (e.g. minimum convex polygon (MCP)), particularly when data are scarce or when species are rare (Marcer et al, 2013; Pena et al, 2014; Syfert et al, 2014); and also avoid potential subjective bias of experts (Fourcade et al, 2013). We used a minimum threshold (Anderson, Lew & Peterson, 2003) to convert raw model outputs (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) protocol for vulnerability analysis (IUCN 2001) uses the term extension of occurrence (EOO) for the range distribution of a particular species. Other model developers have interpreted the SDM predicted distribution as a surrogate for the EOO (Sergio et al 2007, Tarrant and Armstrong 2013, Pena et al 2014, thereby giving a broad meaning to the vulnerability analysis. Therefore, we tentatively use those categories to evaluate D. nigra vulnerability because the IUCN (2001) supports the use of predicted distributions.…”
Section: Vulnerability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%