2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the component structure of four self-report measures of impulsivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
61
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
61
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be the case that speed of response initiation is more context-specific than other dimensions, leading to relatively low intercorrelations among scale items. The prominence of Impulsivity in theory and empirical work regarding temperament (e.g., Buss & Plomin, 1975;Schwebel, 2004) and personality (e.g., Miller, Joseph, & Tudway, 2004), combined with adequate cross-rater and longitudinal stability of this scale, support our decision to retain this scale in the ECBQ.The factor structure of the ECBQ was consistent across the two samples. In addition, the three factors were highly similar to those that have emerged in analysis of comparable finegrained measures suitable to infants (e.g., Gartstein & Rothbart, 2003) and older children ).…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be the case that speed of response initiation is more context-specific than other dimensions, leading to relatively low intercorrelations among scale items. The prominence of Impulsivity in theory and empirical work regarding temperament (e.g., Buss & Plomin, 1975;Schwebel, 2004) and personality (e.g., Miller, Joseph, & Tudway, 2004), combined with adequate cross-rater and longitudinal stability of this scale, support our decision to retain this scale in the ECBQ.The factor structure of the ECBQ was consistent across the two samples. In addition, the three factors were highly similar to those that have emerged in analysis of comparable finegrained measures suitable to infants (e.g., Gartstein & Rothbart, 2003) and older children ).…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…It may be the case that speed of response initiation is more context-specific than other dimensions, leading to relatively low intercorrelations among scale items. The prominence of Impulsivity in theory and empirical work regarding temperament (e.g., Buss & Plomin, 1975;Schwebel, 2004) and personality (e.g., Miller, Joseph, & Tudway, 2004), combined with adequate cross-rater and longitudinal stability of this scale, support our decision to retain this scale in the ECBQ.…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, it may be important in future research of this eating disorder to investigate alternative measures of impulsivity, as this construct has historically proved difficult to satisfactorily define. 21 While previous research suggest no difference in Axis II disorders between the two eating groups, 3 if this suicidality is associated with disordered personality styles in the current study then this would represent a negative prognostic factor for BN-P compared to EDNOS-P. 22 The findings from this study should be interpreted in the light of two important limitations. First, there was a moderate response rate for the current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…What is more intriguing is the observation that motor impulsivity counterpredicts depressive mood, thus providing some protective effect. In view of the two suggested dimensions of motor impulsivity: functional and dysfunctional; such a notion is not unwarranted (Miller, Joseph, & Tudway, 2004). Hence, the functional dimension of motor impulsivity, i.e.…”
Section: Protective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%