1999
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb00570.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Barriers and Changes of Cross‐Cultural Supervision: A Case Study

Abstract: This article examines conflicts and communication problems that can occur in cross-cultural supervisory relationships when cultural issues are not addressed. Recommendations for cross-cultural supervision are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent calls for ethical multicultural supervision (Pope & Vasquez, 1998;Vasquez, 1992) and endorsement of the multicultural counseling competencies by the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES; D'Andrea & underscore the need to move beyond a monocultural and ethnocentric application of supervision (Daniels, D'Andrea, & Kyung Kim, 1999). In particular, supervisors must model and impart multicultural competencies Sue, Arredondo, & McDavis, 1992) to supervisees, thereby ensuring that future generations of counselors meet the needs of society's changing demography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent calls for ethical multicultural supervision (Pope & Vasquez, 1998;Vasquez, 1992) and endorsement of the multicultural counseling competencies by the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision (ACES; D'Andrea & underscore the need to move beyond a monocultural and ethnocentric application of supervision (Daniels, D'Andrea, & Kyung Kim, 1999). In particular, supervisors must model and impart multicultural competencies Sue, Arredondo, & McDavis, 1992) to supervisees, thereby ensuring that future generations of counselors meet the needs of society's changing demography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several researchers have recommended the use of semistructured questions to prompt the discussion of cultural issues in the supervision process (Constantine, 1997;Cook, 1994;Daniels et al, 1999;Helms & Cook, 1999 In particular, Helms and Cook developed a collaborative exercise for assessing cultural style in the supervision process. Daniels et al also recommended mutual, open discussions of multicultural strengths and limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature on multicultural supervision suggests that it is the supervisors' responsibility to address racial and cultural issues with their supervisees (Bernard & Goodyear, 1998;Daniels, D'Andrea, Kim, & Soo, 1999;McNeill, Hom, & Perez, 1995), yet supervisors often ignore or avoid cultural issues (Remington & DaCosta, 1989). We have presented a developmental approach to cross-racial supervision that considers the importance of the racial identity development of the supervisor and the supervisee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The supervisor and supervisee may need to initiate an open, but mutually respectful, conversation about the differences early in the relationship (Daniels & D'Andrea, 1996). Supervisors should recognize the inherent power differential in the supervisory relationship, navigating the conversation accordingly to actively learn about the supervisee's culture, experiences, perspectives, and goals (Daniels, D'Andrea, & Kyung Kim, 1999).…”
Section: Problems In the Supervisory Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%