Remote Sensing and GIS Accuracy Assessment 2004
DOI: 10.1201/9780203497586.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Accuracy of Satellite-Derived Land-Cover Classification Using Historical Aerial Photography, Digital Orthophoto Quadrangles, and Airborne Video Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Care must also be taken in interpretation of these land cover changes. In the accuracy assessment of the classified cover maps by Skirvin et al [2004] they noted that both the producer and user accuracies for the mesquite woodland class were low for all four dates (80% and 30%, respectively, for 1973, and 65% and 40% for the other dates). In addition, they noted particular problems with the mesquite woodland class by noting, “it was likely that neither the spectral nor the spatial resolution of MSS imagery was adequate to distinguish the mesquite woodland class in a heterogeneous semiarid environment, where most pixels are mixtures of green and woody vegetation, standing litter, and soils of varying brightness” [ Skirvin et al , 2004, p. 127].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care must also be taken in interpretation of these land cover changes. In the accuracy assessment of the classified cover maps by Skirvin et al [2004] they noted that both the producer and user accuracies for the mesquite woodland class were low for all four dates (80% and 30%, respectively, for 1973, and 65% and 40% for the other dates). In addition, they noted particular problems with the mesquite woodland class by noting, “it was likely that neither the spectral nor the spatial resolution of MSS imagery was adequate to distinguish the mesquite woodland class in a heterogeneous semiarid environment, where most pixels are mixtures of green and woody vegetation, standing litter, and soils of varying brightness” [ Skirvin et al , 2004, p. 127].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as no ground data exist for the earlier dates in the series, we assessed the classification accuracies for the 1987, 1996, and 2004 data using coincident high-resolution aerial imagery (table 1). This method provides an acceptable alternative to the field-based accuracy assessments, but successful assessment depends upon the image quality and expert interpretation of the high-resolution imagery (Skirvin et al 2004 were of higher quality than the 1996 and 1980 imagery, but all were generally of com parable quality and pixel resolution between years (table 1). Land-cover classes were interpreted from these high-resolution images by M. L. Villarreal, who is a trained photogrammetrist with more than 10 years experience interpreting aerial photographs from the region.…”
Section: Land-cover Map Accuracymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis (ISODATA) classification in ESRI ArcGIS is a robust clustering algorithm for areas with sparse ground-truth data and is used initially to understand the distribution of pixels DNs within a mosaic (Ball and Hall, 1967;Liu and Mason, 2016). An exaggerated number of clusters (≥15) is established across the range of spectral values, and neighboring clusters are merged until the overlap between cluster quartiles is ≤1% ( Figure 4E) (Anderson and Cobb, 2004;Skirvin et al, 2004;Okeke and Karnieli, 2006;Bolles et al, 2017). A majority filter is applied to reclassify pixels where it can be reasonably assumed the pixel belongs to the surrounding cluster, producing a smoothing effect (Mather and Koch, 2011;Liu and Mason, 2016).…”
Section: Processing and Analysis Of Digitized Historical Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%