Assessing the accuracy and quality of YouTube videos on early pregnancy loss

McNamee, Lisa; Shakartzi, Hannah; Wasser, Thomas; Li, Yan; Kim, Chi-Son

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11947

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Assim, a pontuação de cada um dos vídeos no mesmo teste, ou seja, a maioria (52,3%) foi considerada fonte questionável e provavelmente não confiável de informação (12,15) . Em suma, a pontuação obtida no teste CRAAP indica que os vídeos avaliados são atuais, de pouca relevância, elaborados por autores não confiáveis ou sem expertise na temática, de baixa acurácia e frágil finalidade (15) .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…De maneira inversa, a pesquisa que usou o mesmo instrumento de avaliação crítica das informações, analisou os vídeos educacionais sobre o manejo da dor causada por agulha que estão disponíveis publicamente e percebeu que a maioria dos vídeos é atual (96%), relevante (100%), elaborado por uma fonte confiável (76% do quesito autoria) e todos eram precisos, com finalidade relacionada ao conteúdo (25) . Por sua vez, os vídeos relacionados ao aborto precoce e usados como ferramenta para a educação de pacientes, avaliaram 74 vídeos que tiveram pontuação média do teste CRAAP igual a 8,3, indicando fontes de boa qualidade, mas que não atingem o nível acadêmico (12) .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Os vídeos selecionados foram analisados por meio dos seguintes instrumentos: caracterização dos vídeos; teste de confiabilidade Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) (12)(13) ; análise de popularidade do vídeo por meio da determinação do Video Power Index (VPI) (14) ; instrumento contendo as etapas componentes do procedimento de administração de medicamentos por via intramuscular.…”

Section: Métodosunclassified

“…A pontuação máxima foi de 15 pontos. Uma pontuação final de zero a três pontos indica uma fonte de informação questionável, e provavelmente não confiável; uma pontuação entre quatro a sete pontos indica que a informação pode ser confiável, mas exige cautela; uma pontuação de oito a 11 pontos indica uma boa fonte de informação; e 12 a 15 pontos indica uma excelente fonte de informação (12,15) . Também podem ser classificados em fonte muito questionável, que não deve ser consultada (zero a três pontos); fonte que pode ser consultada, mas não deve ser citada (quatro a sete pontos); boa fonte para a consulta e citação (oito a 11 pontos), e excelente fonte para a consulta e citação (12 a 15 pontos) (16) .…”

Section: Métodosunclassified

“…Por tal razão, existem estudos investigando a qualidade dos vídeos de saúde em quase todos os campos da saúde e da Enfermagem (11)(12) . No entanto, identificou-se escassez de investigações abordando a qualidade dos vídeos com o propósito de ensinar e/ ou demonstrar o procedimento de administração de medicamentos por via intramuscular.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Intramuscular drug administration: characterization of Brazilian videos on YouTube®

Alves,

Magnabosco,

Godoy

et al. 2023

Rev Rene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to characterize videos that contain a demonstration of the procedure for administering drugs intramuscularly to adults. Methods: a descriptive cross-sectional study, 44 Brazilian videos available on YouTube® were selected which addressed the procedure of intramuscular drug administration. Results: the majority of the videos selected are of personal origin (86.4%), were made by a Nursing technician (59.1%), used the dorsal gluteal region as the injection spot (54.5%), and were produced in a healthcare environment using a patient to demonstrate the procedure (52.3%). No video showed the completeness of the procedure, and a high frequency of errors was identified at all stages of the procedure. There was a statistically significant difference between the reliability and popularity tests of the videos (p=0.042). Conclusion: the videos on intramuscular drug administration available on the YouTube® platform were considered to be up-to-date, of little relevance, produced by unreliable sources, of low accuracy, and with a weak purpose. Contributions to practice: the videos available on the YouTube® platform on intramuscular drug administration should not be used as educational material for professional training or updating.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Métodosunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Intramuscular drug administration: characterization of Brazilian videos on YouTube®

Alves,

Magnabosco,

Godoy

et al. 2023

Rev Rene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Media Illiteracy and its Implications on Sexual permissiveness and Unrealistic Couple Goals among University Students in Tanzania

Fute,

Kangwa,

Oubibi

2023

Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An updated review: women's concerns following miscarriage on multiple social media platforms

Ong,

Davis,

Curiel

et al. 2023

JWRH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explored concerns and unsolicited advice relating to miscarriage shared on multiple social media platforms for mentions of questions, advocacy, medical advice, conflicts of interest, and terminology used to describe miscarriage. Public social media posts in English from January 1st, 2019 to June 30th, 2021 were searched using keywords related to miscarriage. A dataset of questions, advice, conflicts of interest, and terminology used was created from eligible posts determined by inclusionary and exclusionary criteria. The dataset was analyzed to identify themes and calculate statistics. Approximately 1000 posts were reviewed and 149 posts were found eligible for analysis. Of the total, 116 posts included advice and a subset of 71 posts offered questions. A total of 152 mentions of advice were identified from the total eligible posts with 82.9% of advice related to advocacy for destigmatizing miscarriage, enhancing community support, or expressing grief. 17.1% of posts offered medical advice eligible for evaluation of which 73% were accurate across all platforms. From the dataset, 103 questions were analyzed for common themes. The four most common themes of questions included grief, self-blame, quality of post-miscarriage counseling in different care settings, and inadequate medical counseling. This study indicates that women who experience miscarriage have many unanswered questions and powerful feelings relating to grief and self-blame that could have long-term impacts. Social media has become a place for women to self-advocate and connect with others for support, from which clinicians could increase their understanding of women’s unmet needs.

show abstract

Assessing the accuracy and quality of YouTube videos on early pregnancy loss

Cited by 5 publications

References 21 publications

Intramuscular drug administration: characterization of Brazilian videos on YouTube®

Intramuscular drug administration: characterization of Brazilian videos on YouTube®

Media Illiteracy and its Implications on Sexual permissiveness and Unrealistic Couple Goals among University Students in Tanzania

An updated review: women's concerns following miscarriage on multiple social media platforms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About