2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.wox.0000301157.27302.4d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing skin prick tests reliability in ECRHS-I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
48
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
48
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22 It is fast, relatively non-invasive, and significantly better than specific IgE measurement. Once a positive value or reactivity is determined with SPT, it persists during a long time even in treated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It is fast, relatively non-invasive, and significantly better than specific IgE measurement. Once a positive value or reactivity is determined with SPT, it persists during a long time even in treated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, SPT have shown a high sensitivity but a low specificity for allergy diagnosis of asthma and rhinitis (Dreborg, 1989;Brand et al, 1993;Witteman et al, 1996;Bousquet et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive SPT of every single allergen was more strongly related to new-onset of both asthma and nasal allergy than a positive RAST. This association might even increase with the use of a lower cut-off value for SPT [23,25]. Previous studies have stated that the results of SPT and RAST are not interchangeable and that a positive SPT not accompanied by a positive RAST might be due to IgE antibodies that are not detectable by any RAST procedures [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%