2019
DOI: 10.1002/eap.1834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing regional drought impacts on vegetation and evapotranspiration: a case study in Guanacaste, Costa Rica

Abstract: This research investigates ecological responses to drought by developing a conceptual framework of vegetation response and investigating how multiple measures of drought can improve regional drought monitoring. We apply this approach to a case study of a recent drought in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. First, we assess drought severity with the Standard Precipitation Index (SPI) based on a 64‐yr precipitation record derived from a combination of Global Precipitation Climatology Center data and satellite observations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both sites experience a strong 5–6 month dry season that usually spans from late November to mid‐May. The strong ENSO of 2015 coincided with the lowest reported annual rainfall at Santa Rosa (626 mm) in the existing 35 year record from local, manual gauges (Figure S1) and a 64 year record from global datasets (Cooley et al, 2019). The lowest annual rainfall on record for Palo Verde occurred during 2014 (953 mm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both sites experience a strong 5–6 month dry season that usually spans from late November to mid‐May. The strong ENSO of 2015 coincided with the lowest reported annual rainfall at Santa Rosa (626 mm) in the existing 35 year record from local, manual gauges (Figure S1) and a 64 year record from global datasets (Cooley et al, 2019). The lowest annual rainfall on record for Palo Verde occurred during 2014 (953 mm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…During 2015, a severe El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) was associated with a substantial decrease in precipitation and an increase in daily temperature in the tropics (Burton, Rifai, & Malhi, 2018; Cooley et al, 2019). This abnormally strong drought caused major damage to forests in northwestern Costa Rica and in doing so provided the opportunity to investigate the functional characteristics associated with species drought vulnerability under an optimal design, i.e., during an extreme natural event that resulted in high tree mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, climate change models predict that Central America will lead the world in terms of reduced and more variable precipitation (Giorgi, 2006; Rauscher, Giorgi, Diffenbaugh, & Seth, 2008), with premontane areas of Costa Rica estimated to lose up to 40% of their annual precipitation (Karmalkar, Bradley, & Diaz, 2008). In Guanacaste, variation in precipitation has more than doubled since the year 2000, as compared to the preceding half‐century, including the most severe drought on record in 2015 (Cooley et al, 2019). During the 2015 drought, the most affected area of Guanacaste was the northeast (Cooley et al, 2019), coinciding with the distribution of M. modesta in this province (Amundrud et al, 2018; Hedstrom & Sahlen, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Guanacaste, variation in precipitation has more than doubled since the year 2000, as compared to the preceding half‐century, including the most severe drought on record in 2015 (Cooley et al, 2019). During the 2015 drought, the most affected area of Guanacaste was the northeast (Cooley et al, 2019), coinciding with the distribution of M. modesta in this province (Amundrud et al, 2018; Hedstrom & Sahlen, 2001). The global distribution of M. modesta is limited by low annual precipitation and high annual mean temperature (Amundrud et al, 2018), suggesting that increased drought in Guanacaste will result in a contraction of its range toward the wetter areas of the province and expansion up mountain slopes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for why the SPEI and AI did not convey consistent information with the ESI is that the northern LP had higher magnitudes of increased temperature and relatively stable precipitation, which was beneficial for capturing drought information using the SPEI and AI [45]. Another possible reason was that the LAI of grass in the northern LP had a weak increase along with vegetation restoration, and the current climatic conditions may have enabled grass to continue to meet elevated evaporative demand with increased transpiration, consequently leading to a decreased ESI [46]. Some previous studies also reported that the ESI had reasonable spatial and temporal correlations with the SPI, SPEI and PDSI [44,47], while these three indices were calculated over a relatively long time scale and were, therefore, limited as indicators of short-term drought monitoring [48].…”
Section: Suitability Of the Esi For Indicating The Status Of Water Availability On The Lpmentioning
confidence: 99%