2016
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument

Abstract: Research on the graphical facilitation of probabilistic reasoning has been characterised by the effort expended to identify valid assessment tools. The authors developed an assessment instrument to compare reasoning performances when problems were presented in verbal-numerical and graphical-pictorial formats. A sample of undergraduate psychology students (n=676) who had not developed statistical skills, solved problems requiring probabilistic reasoning. They attended universities in Spain (n=127; f=71.7%) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The succeeding sections assessed the basic probabilistic reasoning (in relation to simple and conditional probabilities) in the Numerical and Graphical formats; all items referred to the simple mathematical achievement reached during high school (Agus et al, 2016). This section incorporated five items; these related to the classical problems examined in the literature; specifically, one problem dealt with classical medical diagnoses (for similar problems see, for example Cosmides & Tooby, 1996;Sloman, Over, Slovak, & Stibel, 2003); one was about decks of cards (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974); one was about the outcomes of university examinations (Girotto & Gonzalez, 2001), one was about the roll of dices (Watson & Moritz, 2003); and one was about production defects in a factory (for an example see Appendix; for the questionnaire validation in Italy and Spain refer to (Agus et al, 2016)).…”
Section: Probabilistic Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The succeeding sections assessed the basic probabilistic reasoning (in relation to simple and conditional probabilities) in the Numerical and Graphical formats; all items referred to the simple mathematical achievement reached during high school (Agus et al, 2016). This section incorporated five items; these related to the classical problems examined in the literature; specifically, one problem dealt with classical medical diagnoses (for similar problems see, for example Cosmides & Tooby, 1996;Sloman, Over, Slovak, & Stibel, 2003); one was about decks of cards (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974); one was about the outcomes of university examinations (Girotto & Gonzalez, 2001), one was about the roll of dices (Watson & Moritz, 2003); and one was about production defects in a factory (for an example see Appendix; for the questionnaire validation in Italy and Spain refer to (Agus et al, 2016)).…”
Section: Probabilistic Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confidence in the correctness of the response previously provided was assessed using a Likert scale (from 1 = "not confident" to 5 = "completely confident") associated with each item (for an example see the Appendix) (Agus et al, 2016).…”
Section: / 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that the mode of a student's information input preference could play a role in the speed of the information processing and the way in which they interact with the learning materials. However, empirical research related to the link between students' information-input preferences and their cognitive style and ability within the context of probabilistic reasoning suggests that the interactions between these elements of the learning process are complex and plagued by contradictions, which means that making generalisations and devising practical recommendations regarding the most efficient learning strategy is a highly difficult task [10]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por sua vez, Cabrera, Olmos e Costas (1995) observaram que os testes T ERLS e T EGLS melhoraram seus desempenhos em amostras com pelo menos 500 casos. Igualmente, estudos empíricos foram localizados na literatura com as soluções T ERLS (e.g., Pereda, Arch, Peró, Guàrdia, & Forns, 2011) e T ELS (e.g., Agus, Penna, Peró-Cebollero, & Guàrdia-Olmos, 2016).…”
unclassified