2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing occupational risk of heat stress at construction: A worker-centric wearable sensor-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pattern recognition and parametric tests were used to identify stress hot spots on this walk, and 4 machine learning models were trained to test the predictive power of the immediate environment. Another study used machine learning models for heat strain assessment [ 79 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pattern recognition and parametric tests were used to identify stress hot spots on this walk, and 4 machine learning models were trained to test the predictive power of the immediate environment. Another study used machine learning models for heat strain assessment [ 79 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies (3/14, 21%) [ 46 , 64 , 78 ] compared different methods of using wearables data for core temperature estimation to measured values and found good overall results using HR [ 78 ]; HR and skin temperature [ 46 ]; and HR, skin temperature, and near-body temperature [ 64 ]. Four studies [ 43 , 52 , 67 , 79 ] evaluated different methods to use wearables data (HR or cardiac cost, electrodermal activity, and skin temperature) to assess heat strain and all found high sensitivity or accuracy. Two of these studies paired wearables data with skin temperature or rectal and core temperature measurements for assessment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting dataset, comprising a total of 750 sets of 21 features (six from heart rate, four from breathing rate, four from core temperature and seven from personal characteristics) together with the corresponding fatigue levels, was normalised and fed to machine learning algorithms. Various supervised classification algorithms, previously used for modelling physiological variables responses [ 12 , 15 , 18 , 34 , 35 ] and many health-related purposes [ 36 , 37 ], were evaluated since no previous study assessed this combination of variables for firefighting applications. The tested algorithms included K-nearest neighbours, Boosted Trees (Gradient-boosted Trees, XGBoosted Trees and RUSBoosted Trees), Bagged Trees, Random Forests, Support Vector Machines with different kernel functions (linear, quadratic, cubic and Gaussian) and Artificial Neural Networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors, including intense physical activity, personal protective clothing, and frequent heat events on construction sites, put construction workers at high risk of excessive heat exposure. As such, many studies have used wearable sensors to capture various physiological signals related to heat stress exposure in construction workers (68)(69)(70). They concluded that the use of wearable sensors J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f allowed workers to make health decisions based on objective information and warnings, and thus opened up new avenues for disease prevention and monitoring.…”
Section: The Application Of Wearable Sensors For Assessing Workers' H...mentioning
confidence: 99%