Wearables for Measuring Health Effects of Climate Change–Induced Weather Extremes: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Although climate change is one of the biggest global health threats, individual-level and short-term data on direct exposure and health impacts are still scarce. Wearable electronic devices (wearables) present a potential solution to this research gap. Wearables have become widely accepted in various areas of health research for ecological momentary assessment, and some studies have used wearables in the field of climate change and health. However, these studies vary in study design, demographics, and outcome variables, and existing research has not been mapped. Objective In this review, we aimed to map existing research on wearables used to detect direct health impacts and individual exposure during climate change–induced weather extremes, such as heat waves or wildfires. Methods We conducted a scoping review according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework and systematically searched 6 databases (PubMed [MEDLINE], IEEE Xplore, CINAHL [EBSCOhost], WoS, Scopus, Ovid [MEDLINE], and Google Scholar). The search yielded 1871 results. Abstracts and full texts were screened by 2 reviewers (MK and IM) independently using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria comprised studies published since 2010 that used off-the-shelf wearables that were neither invasive nor obtrusive to the user in the setting of climate change–related weather extremes. Data were charted using a structured form, and the study outcomes were narratively synthesized. Results The review included 55,284 study participants using wearables in 53 studies. Most studies were conducted in upper–middle-income and high-income countries (50/53, 94%) in urban environments (25/53, 47%) or in a climatic chamber (19/53, 36%) and assessed the health effects of heat exposure (52/53, 98%). The majority reported adverse health effects of heat exposure on sleep, physical activity, and heart rate. The remaining studies assessed occupational heat stress or compared individual- and area-level heat exposure. In total, 26% (14/53) of studies determined that all examined wearables were valid and reliable for measuring health parameters during heat exposure when compared with standard methods. Conclusions Wearables have been used successfully in large-scale research to measure the health implications of climate change–related weather extremes. More research is needed in low-income countries and vulnerable populations with pre-existing conditions. In addition, further research could focus on the health impacts of other climate change–related conditions and the effectiveness of adaptation measures at the individual level to such weather extremes.

A systematic review of ambient heat and sleep in a warming climate

“…First, researchers and funding agencies should pursue large-scale cooperative projects leveraging repeated person-level sleep measures (including, but not limited to personal sensing technologies) and longitudinal study designs across larger, and more globally diverse populations, and for longer periods of unobtrusive observation. 87 The geographic distribution of studies conducted so far does not cover the global distribution of the human population (Figures 2, 3B). Drawing on these timeseries data, researchers should explicitly control for time-invariant between-individual differences to identify within-person temperature-sleep responses.…”

Review—Smart Wearable Sensors for Health and Lifestyle Monitoring: Commercial and Emerging Solutions

“…50 Despite the evidence that various environmental characteristics have diverse impacts on human health, personal urban environmental exposure monitoring appears limited. 51 PUFP C200, a personal portable particle counter smart wearable was combined with the NEATVIBE wear TM (Noise Exposure, Activity-Time, and Vibration) wearable. Preliminary field test findings using two laboratory-validated tools that measure personal-scale exposures and noise with high spatiotemporal resolution.…”

Child and adolescent trauma response following climate-related events: Leveraging existing knowledge with new technologies.

“…If children and adolescents have difficulty expressing their emotions or interpreting high stress, physiological indicators such as temperature, heart, and respiratory metrics may be useful. Koch et al (2022) conducted a scoping review and found 53 studies that used wearables to assess the impact of extreme climate-related weather events, almost 10% of which were on children under the age of 18.…”