2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0326-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing landscape functional connectivity in a forest carnivore using path selection functions

Abstract: Context Understanding connectivity patterns in relation to habitat fragmentation is essential to landscape management. However, connectivity is often judged from expert opinion or species occurrence patterns, with very few studies considering the actual movements of individuals. Path selection functions provide a promising tool to infer functional connectivity from animal movement data, but its practical application remains scanty. Objectives We aimed to describe functional connectivity patterns in a forest ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of important habitat patches9 and the functional connection between them510 is critical for constructing ecological networks. The resistance surface covering the entire study area, together with the least-cost paths between pairs of habitat patches, is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The identification of important habitat patches9 and the functional connection between them510 is critical for constructing ecological networks. The resistance surface covering the entire study area, together with the least-cost paths between pairs of habitat patches, is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the main potential corridors are riparian green spaces, followed by forest and farmland, the results indicate that the resistance surfaces constructed by the habitat quality-based model are more suitable for ecological network analyses in Changzhou. Hence, under conditions with insufficiently detailed ecological data, or when it is difficult to obtain such data through experiments, it is more feasible to carry out ecological network analyses using the habitat quality-based model and the minimum cumulative resistance ( MCR ) model, rather than other methods, such as mark and capture53 and wireless wildlife tracking5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The impacts of linear transportation infrastructures are generally associated with direct mortality caused by animal collisions with circulating vehicles (Loss et al 2015;Santos et al 2016), and with barrier effects and the consequent increases in habitat fragmentation and reduced landscape connectivity (Carvalho et al 2016). However, there may also be widespread indirect habitat degradation, because many animal species avoid using areas close to transportation infrastructures (Forman and Deblinger 2000;Torres et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%