Assessing knowledge management success/effectiveness models

Jennex, Murray E.; Olfman, Lorne

doi:10.1109/hicss.2004.1265571

Cited by 101 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This theory recognized that organization performance depends on the capabilities in developing and deploying knowledge. Organizations need to understand how they create and manage new knowledge (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995) to strengthen organization capability to innovate (Jennex & Olfman, 2004). It is expected that:…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Knowledge Management and Entrepreneur’s Knowledge on Innovation and Firm Performance

Hartono

Halim

2014

The Winners

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Knowledge Management and Entrepreneur’s Knowledge on Innovation and Firm Performance

Hartono

Halim

2014

The Winners

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The result of study showed there was a meaningful relationship between organizational structure and knowledge management. Jennex and Olfman (2004) reported that the organizational culture, education and involvement of staff in procedures, planning, decision making assessment and being involved in the process of knowledge are key factors to an up to date knowledge management. Roelandet and Ehssan (2004) studied organizational culture, organizational structure, technology and human resource knowledge capability in ministry of labor & development in Malaysia.…”

Section: Background and Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

The study of relationship between organizational structure and strategic knowledge management in Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch

Akbari¹,

Eslampanah²,

Baharestan³

et al. 2012

MSL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The application of strategic knowledge management requires specific organization structure due to unique and particular characteristics of knowledge. In other words, by passing through industry age toward knowledge age, strategic knowledge management is considered by organizations dramatically and by considering this new competitive edge, universities should prepare an appropriate background for strategic knowledge management (encoding strategy and personalizing strategy). The primary purpose of this research is to find out whether there is a meaningful relationship between organizational structure (recognition, focus and complexity) and strategic knowledge management (codification strategy and personalization strategy) in Azad University, Kermanshah. Organizational structure is considered as independent variables and strategic knowledge management is dependent variables. When it comes to the purpose, present research is an applicable research and based on its nature and method, it is descriptive and survey research. Statistical society consists of university president, vise-president and dean of faculties of Azad University, Kermanshah; during a period of the first half of the year of 2011. Therefore, the sampling method is stratified sampling. Statistical society contains 60 people who are adjusted to 52 sample people by the use of Morgan table. Data collection tool is questionnaire structure questionnaire of Robbins and strategic knowledge management questionnaire of Carolina & ÁngelL. The results of the research show that there is a meaningful relationship between organizational structure and strategic knowledge management in Azad University, Kermanshah, according to codification and personalization strategy. Some suggestions are offered at the end of this research.

show abstract

“…These items are known as main independent factors of the Delone and Maclean IS (information systems) success model. Then [48] mentioned that knowledge could be added to the information quality of the model as information or knowledge performance for achieving the KM success model. The performance of knowledge transfer was examined by the scale adapted from [29], [30].…”

Section: Knowledge Transfer To Knowledge Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Computer Science & Information Technology ( CS & IT )

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

) were collocated with the ICAIT-2016. The conferences attracted many local and international delegates, presenting a balanced mixture of intellect from the East and from the West.The goal of this conference series is to bring together researchers and practitioners from academia and industry to focus on understanding computer science and information technology and to establish new collaborations in these areas. Authors are invited to contribute to the conference by submitting articles that illustrate research results, projects, survey work and industrial experiences describing significant advances in all areas of computer science and information technology.The ICAIT-2016, CRYPIS-2016, NC-2016, ITCSE-2016 Committees rigorously invited submissions for many months from researchers, scientists, engineers, students and practitioners related to the relevant themes and tracks of the workshop. This effort guaranteed submissions from an unparalleled number of internationally recognized top-level researchers. All the submissions underwent a strenuous peer review process which comprised expert reviewers. These reviewers were selected from a talented pool of Technical Committee members and external reviewers on the basis of their expertise. The papers were then reviewed based on their contributions, technical content, originality and clarity. The entire process, which includes the submission, review and acceptance processes, was done electronically. All these efforts undertaken by the Organizing and Technical Committees led to an exciting, rich and a high quality technical conference program, which featured high-impact presentations for all attendees to enjoy, appreciate and expand their expertise in the latest developments in computer network and communications research.In closing, ICAIT-2016, CRYPIS-2016, NC-2016, ITCSE-2016 brought together researchers, scientists, engineers, students and practitioners to exchange and share their experiences, new ideas and research results in all aspects of the main workshop themes and tracks, and to discuss the practical challenges encountered and the solutions adopted. The book is organized as a collection of papers from the ICAIT-2016, CRYPIS-2016, NC-2016, ITCSE-2016 We would like to thank the General and Program Chairs, organization staff, the members of the Technical Program Committees and external reviewers for their excellent and tireless work. We sincerely wish that all attendees benefited scientifically from the conference and wish them every success in their research. It is the humble wish of the conference organizers that the professional dialogue among the researchers, scientists, engineers, students and educators continues beyond the event and that the friendships and collaborations forged will linger and prosper for many years to come.

show abstract

Assessing knowledge management success/effectiveness models

Cited by 101 publications

References 16 publications

The Impact of Knowledge Management and Entrepreneur’s Knowledge on Innovation and Firm Performance

The Impact of Knowledge Management and Entrepreneur’s Knowledge on Innovation and Firm Performance

The study of relationship between organizational structure and strategic knowledge management in Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch

Computer Science & Information Technology ( CS & IT )

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About