1997
DOI: 10.1097/00004356-199709000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing impact of disability awareness training using the Attitudes Towards Disabled Persons Scale (ATDP – Form 0)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…n = Sample. previously reported ATDP scores (35). This latter group were recognised as returning especially high responses, giving rise to the theory that Irish respondents' scores may be higher on this test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…n = Sample. previously reported ATDP scores (35). This latter group were recognised as returning especially high responses, giving rise to the theory that Irish respondents' scores may be higher on this test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The Attitudes toward Disabled People questionnaire (ATDP) Form B (Yuker and Block, 1986) This widely used measure of global attitudes toward disabled persons has been found to be highly reliable and valid in over 20 years of research (Timms et al, 1997;White and Olson, 1998). Test-retest and split-half reliabilities of the measure were reported in the range of 0.71-0.83 and 0.72-0.87, respectively; content validity was established through literature review and item analysis, and criterion and construct validity were established through comparisons with other attitude measures (Yuker and Block, 1986;Antonak and Livneh, 1988;Perry et al, 2008).…”
Section: Patient Resentment Questionnaire (Prq)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study used a pre and posttest design to examine the effectiveness of a two-day awareness training. Timms et al (1997) found that participants' attitudes toward people with disabilities increased slightly, yet did not result in a statistically significant change after the training. The sample participants in this study worked with people with disabilities before and during the study; therefore, a ceiling effect may have also occurred in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%