2007
DOI: 10.5194/gh-62-181-2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing geomorphosites used for rock climbing : the example of Monteleone Rocca Doria (Sardinia, Italy)

Abstract: Abstract. Within the framework of geomorphosite assessment with reference to tourism potential, a new field of research has opened up focusing on sites used for outdoor activities, like free climbing. This line of research in particular focuses on the suitability of geological and geomorphological characteristics of a specific site for a particular sport. Concentrating on geomorphological hazard, rock quality, tourism capacity and site vulnerability, a method of assessment was designed and tested on a number o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several quantitative methods for the assesment of geosites (Alexandrowicz et al, 1992;Koźma, 2009;Rybár et al, 2010;Baca, Schuster, 2011;Bruschi et al, 2011;Dmytrowski, Kicińska, 2011;Fassoulas et al, 2012) and geomorphosites (Serrano, Gonzalez-Trueba, 2005;Panizza et al, 2007;Reynard et al, 2007;Zauros, 2007;Pereira, Pereira, 2010;Rodriges, Fencesca, 2010). All of these methods are based on a method of grading points, which assigns values corresponding to the described features (Sołowiej, 1987).…”
Section: Methods Of Valorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several quantitative methods for the assesment of geosites (Alexandrowicz et al, 1992;Koźma, 2009;Rybár et al, 2010;Baca, Schuster, 2011;Bruschi et al, 2011;Dmytrowski, Kicińska, 2011;Fassoulas et al, 2012) and geomorphosites (Serrano, Gonzalez-Trueba, 2005;Panizza et al, 2007;Reynard et al, 2007;Zauros, 2007;Pereira, Pereira, 2010;Rodriges, Fencesca, 2010). All of these methods are based on a method of grading points, which assigns values corresponding to the described features (Sołowiej, 1987).…”
Section: Methods Of Valorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Eastern and indigenous cultures have placed a much stronger emphasis on harmony with nature and landscape appreciation through different cultural filters [29]. Consequently, a landscape can be understood and appreciated as a cultural image [30], involving all its natural and cultural components existing in a symbiotic, rather than a dichotomous relationship [3,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. For both the dedicated geotourist and particularly the general visitor who has less specialized interest in geology, the nature-culture symbiosis provides a means to enhance the visitor experience of engaging with geoheritage through different aspects of landscape appreciation.…”
Section: Geoheritage and The Cultural Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former include movable (e.g., paintings, sculptures, manuscripts and fossils) and immovable (e.g., buildings, townscapes, monuments, archaeological sites and rural landscapes) constituents; the latter, oral traditions, performing arts, rituals, cuisine, traditional skills and technologies, religious ceremonies and storytelling. As noted by Panizza and Piacente [31,37], aspects of geoheritage may in themselves be interconnections involve complex interactions of cultural practices and values within environmental spaces (in this case geosites and geoparks). As well as providing economic benefits from tourism activities, they also give rise to a range of relational benefits: shaping people's identities (belonging, sense of place, spirituality); experiences (tranquility, inspiration) that enhance well-being, mental and physical health; and knowledge skills and capabilities [55].…”
Section: Geoheritage and The Cultural Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is often the case of leisure sports activities, the geomorphological resource is often the main motivation for destination choice. It is therefore advisable not to ignore the possible risks linked to the dynamic nature of the environment in which these activities take place (Panizza and Manca 2006;Panizza and Mennella 2007).…”
Section: Research Lines and Methodological Issuementioning
confidence: 99%