2018
DOI: 10.1111/evj.12990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing gastrointestinal motility in healthy horses comparing auscultation, ultrasonography and an acoustic gastrointestinal surveillance biosensor: a randomised, blinded, controlled crossover proof of principle study

Abstract: In this proof of principle study, AGIS was able to discriminate between horses given xylazine from those given 0.9% NaCl with comparable accuracy as auscultation and ultrasonography. The Summary is available in Spanish - see Supporting Information.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HR, RR, and GI motility were all evaluated based on auscultation. Auscultation for GI motility was performed using a stethoscope and listening to the four abdominal quadrants (right and left paralumbar fossa and caudoventral abdomen) for the duration of 1 min (Vanderbroek et al., 2019). Motility was based on a score of 0–3 from a scoring system that was previously published (Sasaki et al., 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HR, RR, and GI motility were all evaluated based on auscultation. Auscultation for GI motility was performed using a stethoscope and listening to the four abdominal quadrants (right and left paralumbar fossa and caudoventral abdomen) for the duration of 1 min (Vanderbroek et al., 2019). Motility was based on a score of 0–3 from a scoring system that was previously published (Sasaki et al., 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonographic examination is more sensitive and objective to detect changes in intestinal motility than intestinal auscultation (Reef, 1998;Jones et al, 2003). Auscultation is a subjective method and depends on the performer (Vanderbroek et al, 2018). At ultrasonographic examination, the duodenum motility presented a significant increase in MS and DSS groups when compared to the control group 12 hours after administration (P=0.0432).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done in a paper by VanderBroek, et al . by randomising as many variables as possible . By comparing sedated to unsedated horses and not disclosing this information until after the study was complete, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy could be compared between auscultation, ultrasonography and the biosensors with a minimal amount of bias.…”
Section: Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%