2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2012.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing environmental requirements effects on forest fragmentation sensitivity in two arboreal rodents

Abstract: The study of the effect of habitat fragmentation on species that inhabit residual patches requires the investigation of the relationship existing between species distribution and landscape components. To understand which components of landscape mosaics are more influential for species’ persistence, we compared the distribution of two arboreal rodents proved to be sensitive to habitat fragmentation, the\ud hazel dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius and the red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris. Their occurrence in residua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small-scale thinning and clear-cuts may even improve the quality of potential dormouse habitats by creating light open patches with structurally heterogeneous young shrubs (Berg, 1996; Wolton, 2009; Ramakers et al ., 2014; Sozio et al ., 2016; Juškaitis, 2020). Large-scale management practices can however be detrimental to the dormouse populations causing fragmentation, isolation, and loss of important forest patches of high quality (Mortelliti et al ., 2011; Trout et al ., 2012; Zapponi et al ., 2013; Mortelliti et al ., 2014; Sozio et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small-scale thinning and clear-cuts may even improve the quality of potential dormouse habitats by creating light open patches with structurally heterogeneous young shrubs (Berg, 1996; Wolton, 2009; Ramakers et al ., 2014; Sozio et al ., 2016; Juškaitis, 2020). Large-scale management practices can however be detrimental to the dormouse populations causing fragmentation, isolation, and loss of important forest patches of high quality (Mortelliti et al ., 2011; Trout et al ., 2012; Zapponi et al ., 2013; Mortelliti et al ., 2014; Sozio et al ., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a strictly arboreal rodent with low recruitment rate and low population densities (Bright and Morris, 1996; Büchner et al ., 2003; Juškaitis, 2014a, b) the dormouse is particularly vulnerable to habitat fragmentation and habitat loss that follows intense management of woodlands (Trout et al ., 2012). In regions where forest is sparse, fragmented, and managed, silvicultural management practices may be of great importance for the density and ultimately viability of the remaining dormouse populations (Mortelliti et al ., 2011; Zapponi et al ., 2013; Mortelliti et al ., 2014; Dondina et al ., 2016). There is a need for improved evidence-based knowledge on the habitat requirements of the hazel dormouse in heavily managed woodlands to improve conservation and management options of potential dormouse forest habitats (Cartledge et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nest chambers inside the trunks and branches of comparable size with large nestboxes can be found only in mature and old forests and might become a limiting factor in Temperate or Boreal forests managed for industrial logging (Ecke et al 2002, Lampila et al 2009, Bogdziewicz & Zwolak 2014, as well as in Mediterranean forests periodically subjected to large summer wildfires (Sarà et al 2006, Moreira & Russo 2007. In addition to the destruction of mature stands suitable for dormice reproduction, wildfires promote scrubland expansion; thus increasing habitat fragmentation detrimental for dormice and arboreal rodents (Mortelliti et al 2009, Zapponi et al 2013). According to our modelling, predictors would outline a preference for mixed oak-stands, and the connectivity of canopies can facilitate arboreal movements and provide abundant food (Juškaitis & Siozinyte 2008, Sevianu & David 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further benefits of managing forests at the landscape scale include the combination of retention forestry with other land uses (Gustafsson et al 2012) and vice versa, the integration of conservation actions in the existing land use practices (Hansbauer et al 2010, Zapponi et al 2013. The combination of statistical and remote sensing methods, such as LIDAR, could allow the calibration of forest harvesting on local stochastic natural dynamics, overcoming artificial stand constraints.…”
Section: Landscape Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%