2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40732-014-0056-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Derived Conditional Relations Under Reinforcement Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Wayne, improvements in correct responding were observed but to a lesser extent. Some alternative approaches to conducting tests for emergence of untrained skills may be considered to potentially avoid this effect on responding, such as providing reinforcement contingent upon correct responses (Ribeiro, Miguel, & Goyos, 2015;Velasco & Tomanari, 2014) or contingent upon all responses (LeBlanc, Miguel, Cummings, Goldsmith, & Carr, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Wayne, improvements in correct responding were observed but to a lesser extent. Some alternative approaches to conducting tests for emergence of untrained skills may be considered to potentially avoid this effect on responding, such as providing reinforcement contingent upon correct responses (Ribeiro, Miguel, & Goyos, 2015;Velasco & Tomanari, 2014) or contingent upon all responses (LeBlanc, Miguel, Cummings, Goldsmith, & Carr, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this was done in order to strengthen participants' tact responses for subsequent listener tests. Additionally, recent research has suggested that results from tests conducted under reinforcement conditions are comparable to those obtained during traditional unreinforced test trials (Velasco & Tomanari, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, correct responses produced a computer animation and praise while incorrect responses produced a black screen and the next trial. Tacts were reinforced during posttests to strengthen them in participants' repertoires, and avoid extinction (Velasco & Tomanari, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 4 human studies previously retained, only 1 did provide data on individual symmetry trials [8] (overall only 3 studies out of the 37 surveyed didsee Table 1). Two of them [5,6] found up to 17% symmetry errors in the first block but did not report error distribution, which prevents to know whether symmetry was present from the very first trial, i.e., was formed during training, or appeared after a few initial errors, i.e., was secondarily formed. Interestingly, a third study [7] gave evidence of obvious failure to derive symmetry with bilingual pairs of words: out of 24 participants, only 3 reached mastery criterion in the first 40-trial test block while 17 failed to even reach 50% performance.…”
Section: How Spontaneous Is Symmetry?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Finally, two other studies did not report the instructions given and must likewise be excluded from the potential list of valid studies (see Supplementary information). From our initial sample of 37 studies, we are thus left with 4 studies containing neither bidirectional training nor instruction biases: 1 has used sequential pairing [5], 3 have used sequential matching [6][7][8].…”
Section: Instruction Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%