Assessing Corporate Brand Equity of Public Universities

Abstract

Brand equity studies focus heavily on the brands of profit-based organisations. Similarly in Malaysia, while there have been a number of studies on leading brands owned by profit-based organisations (e.g. Petronas, Air Asia and Maxis), few studies have explored branding in relation to not-for-profit organisations, such as public universities. Public universities tend not to place too high a priority on their brand development because they often lack an understanding of the significance of brand equity. The increased pressure on public universities to compete in the highly competitive higher education market, however, is slowly changing this perception. Therefore, this study will offer some preliminary insights into the dimensions contributing to the corporate brand equity of a public university in Malaysia, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). This study illustrates how metrics can be used to assess the brand of a public research university and can facilitate the development of corporate brand equity metric for institutions of higher education. Data collection was conducted using the survey method, distributing questionnaires to 400 students from eight local public universities. The findings of this study indicate that the dimensions of awareness, quality of service, trust and relevance have a positive relationship with USM's corporate brand equity. These findings may help to guide future researchers in understanding the dimensions of brand equity in relation to public universities.

An empirical study of the dynamic relationships between the core and supporting brand equity dimensions in higher education

“…The consensus is that the value of a brand ultimately resides in the minds of consumers. Consequently, what consumers perceive as the value may differ from what the brand owner intends to offer (Md Noor et al, 2019). While the brand equity literature has identified various CBBE dimensions, the four dimensions of CBBE, brand associations, brand awareness, perceived quality and brand loyalty, proposed by Aaker (1991) have served as the foundation of the brand equity research.…”

The Perception of Employees in the Construction of University Brand: Spanish Context Case Study

“…Rachmadhani, Handayani, Wibowo, Purwaningsih, and Suliantoro (2018) detail that the knowledge that students have about the university, amongst other factors, can tip the balance to choose to study in the public or private sphere in Indonesia. Noor, Manan, and Kuthoos (2019) highlight that, amongst other dimensions, brand awareness has a positive relevance with respect to the corporate brand value of Malaysian public universities, so it is importante to be taken into account by educational managers. Finally, Sagynbekova, Ince, Ogunmokun, Olaoke, and Ukeje (2021) argue that brand awareness has often been achieved within the higher education context through promotion and word of mouth (WOM), indicating in their study that electronic word of mouth acts as a mediator of the relationship between social media communication and higher education brand equity.…”

Pemonitoran Paparan Merek Terfokus Menggunakan Pemodelan Topik dan Formulasi Kueri

“…Beberapa literatur (Gatfield et al [22]; Gray et al [23]; Pinar et al [24]; Sujchaphong [25]; Noor et al [26]; de Heer [27]; Khoa [19]; Pinar [20]) menyebutkan bahwa pengelolaan brand pada institusi perguruan tinggi tidak sama dengan pengelolaan brand pada institusi komersial pada umumnya. Pendapat dan temuan para peneliti tersebut serupa dengan pengalaman empiris di universitas studi kasus.…”