Assessing College Students' Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning: The James Madison University Story

Abstract

Quantitative and scientific reasoning is a critical student learning outcome in higher education. Data are presented for large samples of undergraduate students who were assessed as entering freshmen and then again after completing 45-70 credit hours. Results are presented around four key issues that are central to educational assessment. First, entering freshmen with transfer credits for quantitative and scientific reasoning courses that fulfill general education requirements, on average, score similar to entering freshmen without such credit. About 97% of entering freshmen who had transfer credits received their credits through dual enrollment programs. As a sophomore-junior, students who had completed their general education requirements performed similar to students who had started, but not yet finished these requirements. Second, small to moderate correlations were observed between grade-point averages in relevant general education coursework and quantitative and scientific reasoning. Third, students' quantitative and scientific reasoning, on average, increases from freshmen to sophomore/junior years. Finally, the proportion of students who meet faculty-set standards substantially increases from pre-test to post-test. Taken together, results suggest that changes in quantitative and scientific reasoning are a function of relevant courses. Additional research is needed to examine the role of lower-level versus higher-level courses in student performance. Results also indicate a need to investigate how differences in the quality of dual enrollment courses facilitate quantitative and scientific reasoning.

The Assistive Technology for Teaching and Learning of Social Skills for Autism Spectrum Disorder Children: Multimedia Interactive Social Skills Module Application

“…The social skills module's curriculum, objective and learning outcome should be the basis for each instrument's items. It is against the law to alter the learning goal, objective, or outcome to comply with the curriculum (Hathcoat et al, 2016).…”

University-Wide Assessment Days: The James Madison University Model

“…For instance, students who have yet to take any courses in a general education program are compared to students who have partially completed or fully completed the program (as shown for our American History and Political Science requirement in Table 4. 1 (See also Hathcoat, Sundre, & Johnston, 2015, Tables 6 and 7.) Furthermore, we consider score differences among students who have completed their requirements elsewhere (e.g., transfer credits, Advanced Placement credits), allowing us to explore the impact of non-JMU coursework.…”

The Quantitative Reasoning for College Science (QuaRCS) Assessment, 1: Development and Validation

“…Numerous studies have identified general education and/or introductory science courses as venues with the potential to complement the development of numerical skills (e.g., Powell and Leveson 2004, Bray Speth et al 2010, Hester et al 2014, Hathcoat et al 2015. For several decades now, much of the dialogue surrounding the teaching of general education introductory science courses has been focused on instilling "science literacy" (Rutherford andAhlgren 1991, DeBoer 2000).…”