2015
DOI: 10.5038/1936-4660.8.2.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quantitative Reasoning for College Science (QuaRCS) Assessment, 1: Development and Validation

Abstract: Science is an inherently quantitative endeavor, and general education science courses are taken by a majority of college students. As such, they are a powerful venue for advancing students' skills and attitudes toward mathematics. This article reports on the development and validation of the Quantitative Reasoning for College Science (QuaRCS) Assessment, a numeracy assessment instrument designed for college-level general education science students. It has been administered to more than four thousand students o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many students arrive at my classroom innumerate. I base this statement on their poor performance on the Quantitative Reasoning for College Science (QuaRCS) Assessment (Follette et al 2015). Several years ago, two colleagues and I obtained rights to use this assessment.…”
Section: Numeracy Justice and Teaching Statistics At A Community Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many students arrive at my classroom innumerate. I base this statement on their poor performance on the Quantitative Reasoning for College Science (QuaRCS) Assessment (Follette et al 2015). Several years ago, two colleagues and I obtained rights to use this assessment.…”
Section: Numeracy Justice and Teaching Statistics At A Community Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future implementations with a larger sample size, an iterative bootstrapping likelihood ratio test can be used to determine the optimum number of components for a given distribution based on fitting indices such as AIC and BIC [15]. Furthermore, in future studies the validity of the data analysis method can be further examined by surveying students about their test taking effort, as is done in [16].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, with this glaring evidence on the importance of QLR, there arises a need to assess the quality of quantitative skills that the students develop during their postsecondary education (Roohr et al, 2014). Especially for the case of students enrolling STEM degrees in the tertiary level, they are expected to have developed sufficient quantitative skills as science in general is a quantitative endeavour (Follette et al, 2015). Unfortunately, literature suggesting the conduct of such assessment appears to be limited especially for the case of Southeast Asian countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%