2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27780-4_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: Physiological and Behavioral Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work, however, gives more support to this measure (Lahtinen et al 2007) or to related measures that combine heart rate and blood pressure (Fredericks et al 2005). Pupillary reactions are also used and are regarded as sensitive for cognitive load variations (Paas et al 2003b;van Gog et al 2009), but have only been used in a limited number of studies (e.g., Schultheis and Jameson 2004). There are, however, indications that the sensitivity of this measure to workload changes diminishes with age of the participants (van Gerven et al 2004).…”
Section: Physiological Measures As Indications For Cognitive Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work, however, gives more support to this measure (Lahtinen et al 2007) or to related measures that combine heart rate and blood pressure (Fredericks et al 2005). Pupillary reactions are also used and are regarded as sensitive for cognitive load variations (Paas et al 2003b;van Gog et al 2009), but have only been used in a limited number of studies (e.g., Schultheis and Jameson 2004). There are, however, indications that the sensitivity of this measure to workload changes diminishes with age of the participants (van Gerven et al 2004).…”
Section: Physiological Measures As Indications For Cognitive Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer task times, higher fixation counts and their average durations have been shown to be reliable indicators of cognitive effort across a variety of tasks (cf. Rayner, 1998;Schultheis and Jameson, 2004;Iqbal et al, 2005; Stanford Poynter Project).…”
Section: Section Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com relação às fixações do olhar, três medidas podem ser obtidas: 1) Número de fixações, que se refere à quantidade de fixações que são contadas em um determinado período de tempo, ou em uma região específica da tela (interface) ou de um objeto; 2) Tempo de fixação, que consiste no tempo que o participante passou fixando em um mesmo ponto. Segundo alguns autores, quando o tempo de fixação é muito alto, pode significar um aumento da carga cognitiva no usuário (IQBAL et al, 2005;SCHULTHEIS & JAMESON, 2004) e; 3) Dispersão das fixações, que refere-se à quantidade de fixações afastadas das áreas de interesse.…”
Section: Eye Tracking (Rastreamento Ocular)unclassified