2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34568-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing bone mineral changes in response to vitamin D supplementation using natural variability in stable isotopes of Calcium in Urine

Abstract: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of public health importance, particularly in low and middle income countries. Measuring the bone mineral balance (BMB) in a non-invasive manner, and its response to different interventions, is critical to the definition of optimal strategies for its prevention and management. In this study, we demonstrate the usefulness of natural variability in calcium isotopes (δ44/40Ca) of urine and the derived BMB estimates as a biomarker of bone health and its responsiveness to interventi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(30,52) We could not determine Ca absorption, which is strongly influenced by an individual's vitamin D status. (53) Indeed, we found that participants who were 25OHD deficient had the lowest δ 44/42 Ca serum levels irrespective of Ca intake (confirming findings by Rangarajan and colleagues (27) ); this may of course reflect 25OHD effects on bone, too, (54) and requires further study. The δ 44/42 Ca urine showed a significant albeit lower degree of correlation than with δ 44/40 Ca serum with most measures, likely due to individual changes in Ca isotope fractionation occurring in the kidneys as previously described.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(30,52) We could not determine Ca absorption, which is strongly influenced by an individual's vitamin D status. (53) Indeed, we found that participants who were 25OHD deficient had the lowest δ 44/42 Ca serum levels irrespective of Ca intake (confirming findings by Rangarajan and colleagues (27) ); this may of course reflect 25OHD effects on bone, too, (54) and requires further study. The δ 44/42 Ca urine showed a significant albeit lower degree of correlation than with δ 44/40 Ca serum with most measures, likely due to individual changes in Ca isotope fractionation occurring in the kidneys as previously described.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…( 19 ) Finally, in a group of healthy young men, Rangarajan and colleagues showed an increase in Ca isotope ratios after 3 weeks of vitamin D supplementation. ( 27 ) Importantly, these interventional studies have shown that Ca isotope ratios in blood and urine change within days in response to bone demineralization and therefore provide a sensitive tool to monitor disease processes or treatments that affect bone homeostasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Investigations are limited to using (i) Cu stable isotope analysis of dried urine spots on filter paper by laser ablation MC-ICP-MS 30 as a biomarker for Wilson's disease and (ii) the association between the Ca stable isotope composition of urine and changes in bone mineral balance 31 in a new biomarker for osteoporosis. 32 Both cases highlight the potential of isotopesensitive techniques to improve diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Biochemical markers such as bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, NTX, P1NP, CTX only qualitatively reflect bone formation or bone resorption but do not provide a measurement of net BMB [5] [8]. Bone biopsies to determine the mineralization status of the bone are invasive and infrequently performed [8][9][10].In contrast, natural occurring Ca isotopes (CaI) measured in blood serum and urine have been shown to be a potential biomarker for the quantification of mineralization and demineralization processes in the human body [11][12][13][14][15] and may even serve as a sensitive diagnostic tool for the early prediction of osteoporosis [13] [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%