Assessing Barriers in Humanitarian Supply Chains for Cyclone in Coastal Areas of Bangladesh: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) Approach

Abstract

Bangladesh has frequently been affected by natural hazards, notably, cyclones in coastal areas. Humanitarian organizations are always active in helping affected communities through effective humanitarian supply-chain management by providing humanitarian goods and services, which is crucial to aiding vulnerable people after a natural catastrophe. However, some factors cause significant difficulties in achieving feasible humanitarian supply-chain (HSC) management that eventually ends up as a disfunctional and ineffective system to support to the community in need. Therefore, a lack of standard logistics support complicates horizontal cooperation between humanitarian organizations at various stages, along with relief aid. The motive of the paper is to identify and understand the barriers of HSC during the disaster preparedness and immediate response phase, particularly for cyclones in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. Through an extensive literature review and consultation with experts from different humanitarian organizations, 10 barriers were identified. To illustrate the structural relationships among the selected barriers, an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach with additional MICMAC (Matriced’ Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée á unClassement) analysis is used for data analysis. This aids in evaluating relative dependencies and driving power among the selected barriers. Findings show that a lack of an integrated approach and coordination among government and other humanitarian stakeholders, the inefficacy of multilateral information sharing among them, and a shortage of experienced logisticians are the barriers with the highest driving powers in HSC. The findings of this study will help humanitarian experts, aid agencies who distribute humanitarian aid, and organizations, to set up a good supply chain for helping people in the coastal area of Bangladesh following cyclones.

Enhancing resilience in transnational E-commerce supply chains: Critical factors, perspectives and strategic action plan

“…The five perspectives considered were managerial (P1), information (P2), integration (P3), production (P4), and environmental (P5). These perspectives were adopted by Tyagi et al [ 67 ], Sim et al [ 68 ] and Al Amin et al [ 69 ], who added the environmental perspective to enhance sustainability performance. The study used Kappa statistics to measure the consistency of each factor from five perspectives.…”

An Evaluation of the Humanitarian Supply Chains in the Event of Flash Flooding

“…Singh et al (2018) identified and analyzed factors for developing resilience in humanitarian supply chains using the fuzzy MICMAC approach [56][57][58]. Rahman Md Mostafizur et al (2022) used Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) to assess the barriers in the humanitarian supply chain in coastal Bangladesh under the influence of cyclones [59]. Giedelmann-L Nicolas et al (2022) used a dynamic systems model approach to compare centralized and decentralized supply chain configurations and applied it to humanitarian supply chains to provide applicable inventory management strategies for food relief in relief operations [60].…”

“…Goal planning [55] The impact of supply chain agility (SCAG) and supply chain resilience (SCRES) on performance, mediated by organizational culture, was investigated DCV [56] Fuzzy MICMAC methodology was used to identify and analyze the factors that develop resilience in humanitarian supply chains Fuzzy-MICMAC [59] Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) was used to assess the barriers in the humanitarian supply chain in coastal Bangladesh under the influence of cyclones ISM [60] A dynamic systems model approach was used to compare centralized and decentralized supply chain configurations and apply them to humanitarian supply chains Dynamic systems model Thirteen representative indicators were selected to evaluate humanitarian supply chain resilience factors, and the VIKOR evaluation method was used to rank the resilience of humanitarian supply chains in five typical disaster areas…”