1984
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6629(198401)12:1<61::aid-jcop2290120108>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing a CMHC's impact: Resident and gatekeeper awareness of center services

Abstract: One accessible measure of the impact a community mental health center has on the community it serves is the awareness levels of both residents and gatekeeper groups regarding the center's existence and services. This broad‐based study was conducted with university students at no cost to the center and included 436 residents and 175 gatekeepers. The results indicated that awareness levels for community residents and gatekeeper groups were 34% and 53%, respectively, but varied dramatically as a function of how t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant step in the study of service continuance has been the shift in focus from demographic characteristics of the service recipient to service system barriers and pragmatic day-today constraints. Researchers have increasingly focused on barriers related to affordability (Lorefice, Borus, &L Keefe, 1982;Sharfstein & Taube, 1982;Takeuchi, Leaf, & Kuo, 1988); transportation and child care (Margolis & Meisels, 1987;Temkin-Greener, 1986); accessibility (Acosta, 1980;Cohen, 1972;Graziano & Fink, 1973 , 1985); and system characteristics such as the availability of services (Leaf, Bruce, Tischler, & Holzer, 1987;Scott, Balch, & Flynn, 1984;Stefl & Prosperi, 1985), hours of operation and configuration of services (Good, 1990;Margolis & Meisels, 1987;Sledge et al, 1990), and delays in scheduling appointments (Leigh, Ogborne, & Cleland, 1984;Sirles, 1990). Low-income families are particularly challenged by difficulties in meeting basic daily living needs, which can interfere with accessing and continuing in services for their children.…”
Section: Service Continuancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant step in the study of service continuance has been the shift in focus from demographic characteristics of the service recipient to service system barriers and pragmatic day-today constraints. Researchers have increasingly focused on barriers related to affordability (Lorefice, Borus, &L Keefe, 1982;Sharfstein & Taube, 1982;Takeuchi, Leaf, & Kuo, 1988); transportation and child care (Margolis & Meisels, 1987;Temkin-Greener, 1986); accessibility (Acosta, 1980;Cohen, 1972;Graziano & Fink, 1973 , 1985); and system characteristics such as the availability of services (Leaf, Bruce, Tischler, & Holzer, 1987;Scott, Balch, & Flynn, 1984;Stefl & Prosperi, 1985), hours of operation and configuration of services (Good, 1990;Margolis & Meisels, 1987;Sledge et al, 1990), and delays in scheduling appointments (Leigh, Ogborne, & Cleland, 1984;Sirles, 1990). Low-income families are particularly challenged by difficulties in meeting basic daily living needs, which can interfere with accessing and continuing in services for their children.…”
Section: Service Continuancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hispanics, non-Hispanic blacks, and those with less education are less likely to obtain specialty mental health care than the general population [12-14]. Even when patients recognize a need for behavioral health services, many are unaware of their options for receiving that care, or have problems accessing the system due to availability of providers or financial barriers [15-18]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%