2017
DOI: 10.1108/aa-01-2017-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly sequence planning for motion planning

Abstract: Abstract-This paper develops a planner to find an optimal assembly sequence to assemble several objects. The input to the planner is the mesh models of the objects, the relative poses between the objects in the assembly, and the final pose of the assembly. The output is an optimal assembly sequence, namely (1) in which order should one assemble the objects, (2) from which directions should the objects be dropped, and (3) candidate grasps of each object. The proposed planner finds the optimal solution by automa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang and Hauser [15] formulate pile stability and manipulation feasibility constraints in a packing planner that can handle arbitrary, nonconvex objects. Similar types of constraints have been considered in research that has extended classical assembly planning approaches to physical robot manipulators [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Hauser [15] formulate pile stability and manipulation feasibility constraints in a packing planner that can handle arbitrary, nonconvex objects. Similar types of constraints have been considered in research that has extended classical assembly planning approaches to physical robot manipulators [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, many projects were developed using grasping poses planned by the algorithms in this article. These projects use the planned grasps to iteratively select start and goal poses in the robot workspace [43]- [45], build manipulation graphs [46]- [50], or optimize object assembly sequences [51]- [53]. Although the proposed algorithms were heavily used in these projects, they were not carefully introduced or analyzed.…”
Section: Relations To Our Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving the partial assembly between steps is allowed for improving these measures. Wan et al [15] optimize sequences based on a score for the ease of 3D part insertion derived from contact normals (ignoring potential disturbances that can occur along the motion). Anders et al [16] also learn from simulation to plan pushing motions for planar objects.…”
Section: B Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%