2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.10.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly into snoRNP controls 5′-end maturation of a box C/D snoRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower levels of pre-and mature RPR1 and SNR52 RNAs detected in the KE mutant in vivo likely stem from a combination of their non-canonical type 2 promoter structure, their unique processing and/or a requirement for specific RNA binding proteins to prevent their degradation (Lygerou et al, 1994;Srisawat et al, 2002;Preti et al, 2006;Palsule et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower levels of pre-and mature RPR1 and SNR52 RNAs detected in the KE mutant in vivo likely stem from a combination of their non-canonical type 2 promoter structure, their unique processing and/or a requirement for specific RNA binding proteins to prevent their degradation (Lygerou et al, 1994;Srisawat et al, 2002;Preti et al, 2006;Palsule et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both RPR1 and SNR52 are synthesized as precursor RNAs from tRNA-like promoter elements that are positioned upstream of the mature RNAs and thus produce precursor RNAs with long 5' leader sequences (Lee et al, 1991b;Harismendy et al, 2003;Lee et al, 2003;Preti et al, 2006). Although both genes contain A-and B-box internal promoter elements, the B-box in RPR1 deviates from consensus (Lee et al, 1991a) and the distance between the boxes in SNR52 is significantly longer than is typical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed re-analysis of the C. elegans tiling microarray data [ 34 ] indicated the existence of similar primary transcripts arising from several genomic UM2 loci, and subsequent 3'RACE verified this. The fact that a UM2-containing primary transcript could not be identified at all inspected loci (including the endogenous CeN37 locus used for the reporter construct) could owe to the primary transcripts being inherently unstable and rapidly degraded during snoRNA maturation [ 33 ]. The C. elegans UM2 primary transcripts resemble the dicstronic tRNA-snoRNA transcripts found at a few plant and yeast loci [ 29 , 32 , 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that UM2 is derived from tRNA genes that have served as promoters for downstream ncRNA genes, as similar tRNA-snoRNA dicistronic transcriptional structures have been described in plants and yeast [ 29 - 32 ]. Most of the UM2 loci encode snoRNAs which generally produce uncapped transcripts terminated at an oligo-T tract, and are thus likely to be transcribed by polymerase III [ 6 ], though the lack of a cap could also be due to processing of the primary snoRNA transcript [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nop1p has also been shown to influence Rnt1p cleavage of pre-U18 snoRNA (32). The assembly of snoRNP has also been shown to be coupled to 5Ј-end maturation of independently transcribed box C/D snoRNAs (60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%