2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-017-2107-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assemblages and habitat preferences of soft bottom Antarctic Amphipoda: Admiralty Bay case study

Abstract: of colonial organisms identifying the assemblage (B). Third group of deep water species represented assemblage C, while the group of species preferring fine-grained sediments was found in assemblage D. The surrogacy analysis demonstrated low usefulness of this method in the description of Antarctic amphipod assemblages in non-disturbed areas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water depth is proposed to regulate benthic food input, its quantity and quality, by modifying particle residence time in the water column (Smith et al 2006), thus also regulating benthic distribution. This could explain why some TUs such as polychaetes, isopods, amphi pods, and bryozoans have been described as water-depth-dependent groups on Antarc-tic shelves (Elling sen et al 2007, Saiz et al 2008, Jazdzewska & Sicinski 2017. In contrast, e.g.…”
Section: Environmental Drivers For Benthic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water depth is proposed to regulate benthic food input, its quantity and quality, by modifying particle residence time in the water column (Smith et al 2006), thus also regulating benthic distribution. This could explain why some TUs such as polychaetes, isopods, amphi pods, and bryozoans have been described as water-depth-dependent groups on Antarc-tic shelves (Elling sen et al 2007, Saiz et al 2008, Jazdzewska & Sicinski 2017. In contrast, e.g.…”
Section: Environmental Drivers For Benthic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study investigated amphipod FD patterns with reference to the taxonomic diversity patterns in the GoK MNPS. Most amphipod species are mobile in intertidal habitats with relatively high swimming abilities, so they can freely move between the areas rich in food and also to protect them from predation (Jażdżewska and Siciński, 2017). In the current study, mobile epifaunal amphipod abundances were observed to be higher at the LW of the all intertidal transects except T-I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%