2013
DOI: 10.1345/aph.1r331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspirin for the Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolic Events in Orthopedic Surgery Patients: A Comparison of the AAOS and ACCP Guidelines with Review of the Evidence

Abstract: Recent changes to both the ACCP and AAOS guidelines are in agreement for those who choose to use aspirin for chemoprophylaxis of VTE. Current surgical care improvement project measures do not include aspirin as an appropriate sole option for the prevention of VTE, but in patients undergoing elective TKA or who have a contraindication to pharmacologic prophylaxis and undergo a THA or HFS, aspirin in conjunction with compression devices as part of a multimodal approach would meet these measures. Data do not supp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aspirin is not an appropriate sole option for prevention of VTE after hip fracture 184 but can be considered as an option if part of a multimodal approach to prevention including other means such as mechanical compression devices. 185 Aspirin has not been found to have a lesser risk of bleeding complications when compared with other pharmacologic options. 185 …”
Section: Pharmacologic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspirin is not an appropriate sole option for prevention of VTE after hip fracture 184 but can be considered as an option if part of a multimodal approach to prevention including other means such as mechanical compression devices. 185 Aspirin has not been found to have a lesser risk of bleeding complications when compared with other pharmacologic options. 185 …”
Section: Pharmacologic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, aspirin, the only nonanticoagulant, has been the source of greatest controversy. 4,9,10 Two previous systematic reviews comparing aspirin to anticoagulation for VTE prevention found conflicting results. 11,12 In addition, both used indirect comparisons, a method in which the intervention and comparison data come from different studies, and susceptibility to confounding is high.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-standing controversy exists surrounding the use of aspirin to prevent VTE [12]. Opponents of aspirin have maintained that it may not provide adequate reductions in life-threatening thromboembolic events, particularly within the low-flow, low-shear venous system where fibrin and red blood cell-rich clots predominate.…”
Section: The Role Of Aspirin In Vtementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change was primarily driven by a shift towards basing recommendations on the use of prophylaxis to reduce ''patient-important'' symptomatic VTE events only, rather than also including asymptomatic events, as well as taking into consideration the hazard of symptomatic bleeding (i.e. net clinical benefit [12,26]). These significant changes in recommendations have come under considerable scrutiny [28].…”
Section: Differences Between Aaos and Accp Guidelines In The Orthopedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation