2002
DOI: 10.1117/1.1481898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspheric optics: smoothing the ripples with semi-flexible tools

Abstract: A well-known fabrication problem with aspheric optical surfaces lies in high-frequency surface irregularities inherent in the figuring process. Optical grinding and polishing tools can smooth these ripples, yet retain the flexibility required to fit the aspheric surface. An f/0.52, paraboloidal, 17-in. convex surface is produced with conventional rigid tools. A transmission ronchigram is obtained showing highspatial-frequency errors of large magnitude. After four hours of grinding with a semi-flexible multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 3(1), it was explained that the final k is related to κ total , V, and K p . Applying (11) to the K p measured in Section 3(3) and the κ total calculated from the SF function, we can express the surface error as a function of the smoothing time t directly. An example having a 0.3-µm ε ini is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Smoothing Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Section 3(1), it was explained that the final k is related to κ total , V, and K p . Applying (11) to the K p measured in Section 3(3) and the κ total calculated from the SF function, we can express the surface error as a function of the smoothing time t directly. An example having a 0.3-µm ε ini is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Smoothing Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Jones simulated MSF error evolution based on a simple linear parametric model [9], and Mehta and Reid later proposed the classic Bridging model to study the smoothing effect, which is based on the theory of elasticity [10]. Tuell et al then improved the Bridging model using the spatial Fourier decomposition method [11]. Later, Kim et al introduced a parametric smoothing model based on the simplified Bridging model to describe smoothing effects [12]; this parametric smoothing model was further verified by Shu et al using a correlation-based model [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sinusoidal surface error's pressure distribution was attained from a series of differential equations under the given boundary conditions, and it was supposed to be proportional to its amplitude. The bridging model was further applied to the aspheric surface polished by Burge et al [9] and Tuell et al [10]. Kim et al [11] developed the normalized smoothing factor based on the simplified bridging model and conducted a contrast experiment on pitch lap and rigid conformal lap, which is verified by Shu et al [12] with the help of a correlation-based smoothing model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the SP process shown in Fig. 11, the optical surface is smoothed by a Φ150 mm semi-flexible polishing lap [10,11] while the average applied pressure is 20 KPa. The pitch pad is also 4 mm.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer-controlled polishing machines and mathematical models to analyze material removal characteristics have been developed for polishing spherical, aspheric and free form surfaces, where small-size tools are employed [3][4][5][6] . We presented our efforts in developing a polishing process using a large size polishing lap, where a mathematical model was developed to estimate the residual surface errors under a given set of operating parameter and lap configurations 7,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%