2005
DOI: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of the rural-urban transformation of countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Lucas (2004) explicitly models rural-urban migration and the shift from a traditional technology (with no productivity growth) to a modern technology, by suggesting human capital has no productivity advantages in rural areas, but migrants invest in human capital in the urban sector because it is productivity enhancing. Henderson and Wang (2005) analyse a similar transition in a context where endogenous productivity growth through human capital formation is higher in urban than rural areas and the urban sector consists of an endogenous number of cities.…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Lucas (2004) explicitly models rural-urban migration and the shift from a traditional technology (with no productivity growth) to a modern technology, by suggesting human capital has no productivity advantages in rural areas, but migrants invest in human capital in the urban sector because it is productivity enhancing. Henderson and Wang (2005) analyse a similar transition in a context where endogenous productivity growth through human capital formation is higher in urban than rural areas and the urban sector consists of an endogenous number of cities.…”
Section: The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his model, a fall in transport costs increases the size of the market for non-agricultural goods, and also -by lowering prices and raising real incomes -prompts a demand shift towards non-agricultural goods. Henderson and Wang (2005) construct a model of the rural-urban transformation which draws on dual economy ideas, but extended to consider the endogenous evolution of distinct cities, and allowing the formation of new cities. Michaels et al (2012) study the US evolution of populations in rural and urban areas from 1880 to 2000, explaining the observed patterns partly in terms of structural transformation.…”
Section: Growth With Limited Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An area that receives less attention is the benefits from urban agglomeration economies and the growing interest in new economic geography (see Fujita, Krugman and Venables 2001). From this perspective, economic growth accelerates when resources or activities concentrate within geographic areas (Henderson and Wang 2005). Urbanization and industrial localization can generate positive externalities by situating producers closer to labour markets and customers, as well as to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%