Can Cities or Towns Drive African Development? Economywide Analysis for Ethiopia and Uganda

Abstract

Rapid urbanization is an important characteristic of African development and yet the structural transformation debate focuses on agriculture's relative merits without also considering the benefits from urban agglomeration. As a result, African governments are often provided conflicting recommendations on the importance of rural agriculture or urban industry. We develop dynamic economy-wide models for Ethiopia and Uganda that capture both traditional aspects of the debate (growth linkages and foreign trade) and benefits from urbanization (internal migration and agglomeration effects). Simulations suggest that urban agglomeration is an important source of long-term growth and structural transformation, but that investing in cities does not greatly reduce national poverty over the short-term. In this regard, agricultural growth is more effective, albeit with slower national growth. Given these trade-offs, we conclude that …/.

Polytechnic engineering mathematics: assessing its relevance to the productivity of industries in Uganda

“…The medium-to large-scale manufacturing sector is relatively smaller but has substantial establishments in sugar, beer, cigarettes, cotton fabrics, gunny bags, fishnets, and cement. The industrial sector is characterized by low capacity utilization, estimated at 50% of installed capacity (Dorosh and Thurlow 2014). In recent years, the telecommunication sector has blossomed, mainly characterized by an involvement of multinational companies which include MTN Uganda, Airtel, Uganda Telecom, Africell Uganda, Smile Telecom, K2 Telecom, Smart Telecom, and Vodafone Uganda, with total subscription of over 20 million (Hawthorne et al 2016;Ward and Zheng 2016).…”

Urbanization, market development and malnutrition in farm households: evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys, 1986–2011

“…On average, the presence of a nearby town may improve farm household nutrition through increases in income and employment opportunities. Despite the potential benefits of urbanization, an explicit focus on agricultural development may be necessary to achieve poverty reduction (Dorosh and Thurlow 2014). And at a given national income level, nearby urbanization could lead to better rural nutrition through improved access to a wider range of goods and services, including public services such as health care and nutrient-dense foods such as fruits, vegetables and animal products.…”

Agriculture and small towns in Africa

“…This provides a more realistic framework for estimating growth and income multipliers. Dorosh and Thurlow () provide a detailed specification of the CGE model. Below we briefly describe the model, before focusing on its more novel features, that is, internal migration and agglomeration effects.…”

“…Greater attention was paid to farm/nonfarm linkages within rural areas (e.g., Haggblade et al, ) and to the influence of industrial agglomeration effects on the trajectories of core (urban) and peripheral (rural) economies (e.g., Krugman, ). These “rural economy” and “new economic geography” models evolved separately and led to differing views on the importance of rural agriculture vis‐à‐vis urban industry (Dorosh and Thurlow, ). Stifel and Thorbecke () propose an integrated “dual–dual” approach that differentiates both formal/informal sectors and rural/urban areas.…”

“…In this article we “operationalize” the dual–dual approach within a CGE model of Ethiopia—a typical low‐income), our model's structural detail allows us to measure and contrast economy‐wide growth and poverty linkages across sectors. Following Dorosh and Thurlow (), we differentiate between cities, towns, and rural areas and incorporate internal migration and urban agglomeration effects. Our CGE model therefore combines the key insights from traditional, rural economy and new economic geography models.…”