Aspects of the content versus process debate in medical education

Abstract

Traditional western medical education is often concerned with the absorption of an enormous number of facts, leaving the process of problem-solving to happen naturally. The current trend is to increase the process in medical education, sometimes at the expense of content knowledge. This paper analyses some of the literature pertinent to this dilemma. It concludes that a pluralistic approach to the presentation of the scientific process would enhance the student's motivation to obtain the content knowledge necessary to utilize that scientific process. It also suggests that such an approach to education might benefit all professions which rely on problem-solving as part of their activity.

Computer-based analysis of verbal autopsies: revolution or evolution?

“…Initially, diagnosis was regarded as a linear process referred to as hypothetico-deductive reasoning, which involved successive steps of problem definition, formulation of tentative hypotheses, collection of preliminary data, formulation of a specific hypothesis, accumulation of further data that tested the hypothesis, and drawing of diagnostic conclusions [8]. It became obvious, however, that this was a weak process used principally by novices and not by expert diagnosticians.…”

Clinical judgment in nurse-midwifery A review of the research with implications for education

“…In the health care field there is frequently no definitive solution; no one right answer; and often, no certain result. Indeed, some authors have referred to the “art” of clinical judgment as the blending of a large body of knowledge with the scientific method and a willingness to back hunches or intuition 46 . The problem for educators is how to encourage students to tolerate uncertainty and to solve heterogeneous problems.…”