2011
DOI: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-based analysis of verbal autopsies: revolution or evolution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physician-certified verbal autopsy (PCVA) is still the most common approach to interpret VA data [ 20 ] in which local physicians review the questionnaires and assign a probable COD [ 16 , 21 24 ]. Arguments against physician-based certification of CODs from VAs are variations in interpreting VA data due to different training, experience, and/or perceptions of local epidemiology of the reviewing physicians and difficulties of maintaining quality work over long periods of time [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physician-certified verbal autopsy (PCVA) is still the most common approach to interpret VA data [ 20 ] in which local physicians review the questionnaires and assign a probable COD [ 16 , 21 24 ]. Arguments against physician-based certification of CODs from VAs are variations in interpreting VA data due to different training, experience, and/or perceptions of local epidemiology of the reviewing physicians and difficulties of maintaining quality work over long periods of time [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%