ASPAN's Delphi Study on National Research: Priorities for Perianesthesia Nurses in the United States

Mamaril, Myrna; Ross, Jacqueline; Poole, Ellen L.; Brady, Joni M.; Clifford, Theresa

doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2008.11.002

Cited by 19 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The anonymous nature of the process has advantages: participants are likely to be more willing to give their honest opinion and to be less anxious about being controversial than they might be in focus groups or other meetings; and strong personalities cannot dominate the group or lead opinion, and the 'bandwagon effect' is minimised (Yousuf, 2007). However, it has been suggested that anonymity makes participants less accountable (Mamaril et al, 2009).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The present study sought the views of all NHS Highland midwives working at all grades and roles (n=280) as they were expected to have expert knowledge of the midwifery issues (both local and general) that might be addressed through research. As well are requiring participants to understand the topic being investigated, it has been noted that the findings from a Delphi study are strengthened when panellists who would be directly affected by the outcomes are included (Mamaril et al, 2009). The focus on practising midwives was felt to be important, as practitioner-derived questions have been found to be concrete, practical and to provide an important service focus (Booth, 2008).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Prioritising research and dissemination: a Delphi study of NHS Highland midwives

Irvine

Jessiman²,

Felce³

2012

LIR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on a Delphi study undertaken by a health librarian and two midwifery professionals, to determine the research priorities of midwives working in NHS Highland. Six important topics were identified: workforce issues, second stage of labour, obesity in pregnancy, women’s expectations of pregnancy and of childbirth, place of birth, and breastfeeding. Related evidence was examined to identify topics where dissemination of existing evidence was needed. The study dealt both with the practice of midwifery in general and with the information needs of local midwives in particular. The Delphi technique was found to be a useful method to determine research priorities but it was not without its limitations.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritising research and dissemination: a Delphi study of NHS Highland midwives

Irvine

Jessiman²,

Felce³

2012

LIR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the ASPMN expert panel continues to endorse compliance with state mandates, standards promulgated by professional organizations, and institution-specific staffing procedures and acuity measures to determine safe staffing levels. The panel recognizes the work of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses in identifying safe staffing ratios in the PACU and making this a top priority for national research agendas (Mamaril, Ross, Poole, Brady, & Clifford, 2009).…”

Section: Rationalementioning

confidence: 99%

American Society for Pain Management Nursing Guidelines on Monitoring for Opioid-Induced Advancing Sedation and Respiratory Depression: Revisions

Jungquist

Quinlan-Colwell

Vallerand

et al. 2020

Pain Management Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tObjectives: This report presents up-to-date evidence and expert consensus-based revisions to the ASPMN 2011 guidelines that inform interprofessional clinical decision-making for hospitalized adults receiving opioid analgesics. Design: Systematic review of the literature. Methods: A 14-member expert panel was charged with reviewing and grading the strength of scientific evidence published in peer reviewed journals and revising the ASPMN 2011 existing guidelines. Panel members formulated recommendations based on the strength of evidence and reached consensus through discussion, reappraisal of evidence, and voting by majority when necessary. The American Society of Anesthesiologists evidence categories for grading and classifying the strength of the evidence were used. Recommendations were subjected to a critical review by ASPMN members as well as external reviews. Results: The 2011 guidelines were found to still be relevant to clinical practice, but new evidence substantiated refinement and more specific recommendations for electronic monitoring. The revised guidelines present risk factors divided into three categories: patient-specific, treatment-related, and environment of care. Specific recommendations for the use of electronic monitoring are delineated. Conclusions: All hospitalized patients that are administered opioids for acute pain are at risk of opioid induced advancing sedation and respiratory depression, but some patients are at high risk and require extra vigilance to prevent adverse events. All patients must be assessed for level of risk. Adaptations to the plan of care and monitoring strategies should be driven by iterative re-assessments according to level of risk.

show abstract

“…Ahrens 2005) and research priorities in such fields as primary care (Schäfer et al. 2011), perianesthesia nursing (Mamaril et al. 2009), infants, children and adolescents (Wilson et al.…”

Section: Developing Practice and Quality Of Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Priorities in nursing management

Parker

Hyrkäs

2011

Journal of Nursing Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ASPAN's Delphi Study on National Research: Priorities for Perianesthesia Nurses in the United States

Cited by 19 publications

References 20 publications

Prioritising research and dissemination: a Delphi study of NHS Highland midwives

Prioritising research and dissemination: a Delphi study of NHS Highland midwives

American Society for Pain Management Nursing Guidelines on Monitoring for Opioid-Induced Advancing Sedation and Respiratory Depression: Revisions

Priorities in nursing management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About